livingdeb: (Default)
I've been wanting postcards to help me speak out rather than stand idly by. But it's been trouble. Should this be a learning-new-tricks post? Are postcards not a thing anymore? I think they are still sold for tourists, but I guess I don't know anymore, and I was hoping for a cheaper bulk option. I do know there are currently postcard-writing campaigns to get out the vote, but is that just a fluke?

So the obvious place to go was Austin Creative Reuse. All they have are "vintage" postcards. Sometimes. A bit pricier than I'd hoped for.

I tried various other places to no avail.

Finally I went to my local post office. The post office sells plain white postcards with the postage already printed on them for just the price of the postage. But you have to drive there and wait in line. It was time to exercise my car, so this was my excuse.

They did not have any. They said the central post office "might" have some. This is like how my local credit union does not have any cash (except from the ATM, which doesn't understand that sometimes I want a bunch of $5 bills for tips or a bunch of $1 bills for bus fare).

So I looked online. I don't want to buy from Amazon for reasons. Etsy was weird. But supposedly drug stores and Target have postcards. So I looked again today.

Walgreens - I looked with the greeting cards and with the office supplies/envelopes. Nope.

Dollar Tree - Same.

Target - Same. So then I asked someone at the service desk, and he said they have only one kind and told me the aisle, which I'd already been to. (This was the aisle with boxed sets of note cards, FYI.) I checked very thoroughly, and no.

Staples - Surely. Went to the aisle with envelopes where an employee offered to help, and he took me to the other corner of the store with the computer stuff and showed me packages of postcards, four to a page with perforations, for your printer. I took one. Victory!

I never would have thought to look there.

These postcards are completely blank. I could decorate them! But I decided instead to use one side just like an envelope and then use the whole other side to write my concerns. That's probably going to work, right?
livingdeb: (Default)
Due to the climate crisis I'm seeking more ways to enjoy less meat.

The Usual - Beef or Chicken Fried Rice

Today we ate at one of our favorite restaurants, Tan My (Vietnamese, pronounced sort of like "dung mee"). Normally I get beef or chicken fried rice (I know, but it's good) with "extra" bean sprouts. It doesn't come with bean sprouts, or any vegetable pieces at all, but once Robin had extra bean sprouts, so I mixed them in, and I liked it.

The New - Vegetable Fried Rice

I'd vaguely remembered seeing "egg fried rice" listed somewhere differently from all the meat fried rice, but Robin found only "vegetable fried rice," so I got that, also with bean sprouts. They asked if I still wanted the egg, as if without the egg it would be vegan, even though it's almost for sure made with fish sauce, but the egg is my favorite part, so I said yes.

It came with big pieces of broccoli, cabbage, and green onion, plus carrot slices, the requested bean sprouts and big pieces of fried tofu. The tofu was surprisingly boring, but I just cut it up into smaller pieces so there would always be room for the tasty parts in my mouth. Everything else was good, except I don't like broccoli. But that ended up in Robin's mouth, where it was delicious. He gave me his excess carrot slices. I really expected it just to be quite plain and I was planning to add a can of garbanzo beans, but there was no need for any of that.

The Conclusion - Yum

Sometimes the chicken is good and sometimes it's boring. Sometimes the beef is amazing and sometimes it's a bit gristly. So I'd say the vegetable fried rice is not quite as good as the best meat fried rice but it's a little bit better than the disappointing meat fried rice. And so, I am now switching.
livingdeb: (Default)
I like to check out Facebook regularly to get updates on my friends, but I also get news and I also get an education. Here are just three examples of what I learned today:

Music theory as normally taught in schools is racist.

My comments: "Wow. One might expect that there would be classes on Western classical music theory and then also classes on comparative music theory. So finding out that there's just the former, and it's called "music theory" was bad enough. But then we have to find out it was popularized basically for Nazi purposes and so it's yet another horrifying dark shadow we live under. (How open-minded that Schenker included both a Pole and an Italian in his top twelve!)

My favorite part is where he shows that some people think that something without melody can't be music, and some people think that something that's not danceable can't be music.

I also liked when he asked what was the difference between two groups of musicians he had shown pictures of: some were American and some were German."

Then I learned that a Tibetan altitude gene also exists in a recently discovered extinct human species.

My friend's comment: "It's pretty cool if you can say the reason you can breathe in higher altitudes is because some of your ancestors were a completely different species of human."

I also learned that A handful of recent discoveries have shattered anthropologists' picture of where humans came from, and when.

My comment: "There have been a lot of discoveries since my World History class in the late 1970s. Humans were around at least 300,000 years ago (not the 200,000 I learned), now the first-known fossils are from Morocco (not Ethiopia), at least some humans migrated from Africa at least 200,000 years ago (not just the big migration 60,000 years ago), and rather than outcompeting Neanderthals (and newly discovered Denisovans), they may have just intermarried."

And that's why I'm on the computer way too long.
livingdeb: (Default)
What I used to think:

Especially in these days of disappearing ozone, the sun is dangerous, and we should wear sunscreen at all times while outside. When that leads to Vitamin D deficiency, you should take a supplement, because it's hard to get in food.

What I now think:

But this article seems very convincing. (I can't tell what it's called. On the web page, it says "Is Sunscreen the New Margarine?" but the title on a link made on Facebook is "The Shady Link Between Sunscreen and Your Health.")

Short summary: "Avoidance of sun exposure is a risk factor of a similar magnitude as smoking, in terms of life expectancy."

Longer summary: People with low blood levels of Vitamin D have significantly higher rates of many health problems, but Vitamin D supplements have no effect on the problems that have been tested (except helping with calcium absorption). So it's probably sun exposure that causes both the higher levels of Vitamin D and the health benefits.

Increased sun exposure does lead to more nonfatal skin cancers, but also to fewer fatal skin cancers.

What I'm changing:

I'm going to go back to the way I used to wear sunscreen which is to only wear it when I'm going to be out all day for the purpose of preventing sunburn. I will not put it on all the time. I will continue taking one or two 20-minute walks outside per day, but be more careful about the timing.

I will now consider having a tan to be a sign of success rather than a sign of failure.

What I'm not changing:

I'm still wearing sunscreen on my face because I don't want any more skin cancer on my face. (After all the sunburns of my youth, this may be like closing the barn door after the horses have escaped, but I think a couple of the horses may have been napping and are still in there.)

And I'm still wearing a hat because the heat fries my brain, by which I mean that hats prevent headaches when it's really hot.

And I'm still getting UV protection on my glasses, because I still think eyeballs need protection.

And I'm still taking Vitamin D supplements to help ensure that the calcium in my diet is absorbed because I am at high risk for osteoporosis.
livingdeb: (Default)
What I had already learned:

1) The macronutrients are protein (~4 calories per gram), carbohydrates (also ~4 calories per gram), and fat (~9 calories per gram). (This is still considered true.)

2) Alcohol is a carbohydrate. (This is not true.)

First of all, alcohol has ~7 calories per gram. I learned that from a flier I fount on campus when I went there to get my flu shot. Then I did more research.

Men's Journal has an interesting article on "How to Count Alcohol Against Your Daily Macros". They say that "By itself, alcohol is not a carb, fat, or protein. ... To metabolize booze, the body converts ethanol to acetaldehyde to acetate, and then shuttles it through the citric acid cycle—which means alcohol acts like both a carbohydrate and fat." [I don't know what the second sentence means except that acetaldehyde and acetate do not sound like sugars to me, which is what I expect carbs to turn into.]

When you're designing your diet, they say you could count it as a carb or a fat.

Reasons to count it as a fat:
* lots of calories per gram
* overconsuming it, like overconsuming fat, leads to weight gain
* if you're on a low-carb diet, you shouldn't use alcohol instead of other carbs

Reasons to count it as a carb:
* it is not essential life, just like carbs [this is also news to me]
* it interrupts your body's fat-burning process, also like carbs
* most alcoholic beverages have calories from carbohydrates as well as from alcohol
* if you're on a low-fat, high-carb diet, you shouldn't use alcohol instead of fats

KatieRingley.co's Macro Basics for Booze" shows that nutrition labels don't even list the calories that come from alcohol, only those from protein, fat, and carbs. Not that alcoholic drinks even have nutrition labels.

According to the Mayo Clinic's "Nutrition and healthy eating", "Typically "net carbs" is used to mean the amount of carbohydrates in a product excluding fiber, or excluding both fiber and sugar alcohols."

Follow-up question: Wait, isn't fiber a carb and don't we need that? Per Fiber Facts' "Do Fibers Count as Calories and Carbohydrates?", the FDA says that calories from soluble fiber are only partly absorbed by the body and should count as 2 calories per gram; insoluble fiber is not absorbed and can count as 0 calories per gram. But when calculating insulin needs for diabetics, don't count any of the calories because their absorption rates don't affect insulin.

Additional follow-up information: Sugar alcohols are not well absorbed, so you end up with fewer calories per gram than sugar, though none of them are listed under carbs. They are, however, included in the total calorie count.
livingdeb: (Default)
One of the many bizarrely pronounced place names in Austin is being changed. Menchaca Road will be the new name for Manchaca Road.

Apparently no one knows anymore the real origin of the name, but one theory is that it was a misspelling of the name of a Texas soldier, José Antonio Menchaca. I had heard this before. One thing I'd never heard before I read the Austin American Statesman's "It’s official: Manchaca Road is now Menchaca Road" is that "some amateur historians have surmised that the widely accepted mispronunciation of “man-chack” originated with slave owners living in the area. They preferred an anglicized switch to Manchac, the historians say, because of the prejudice against Hispanics that spiked in the aftermath of the Mexican-American War." Okay, that's sickening. And also not how I've heard it pronounced, which has always been "man-shack."

I assume we'll be pronouncing it as spelled now.

Similar road name change from the past: I remember noticing a while back that Arroyo Seca (dry creek) got changed to Arroyo Seco (dry creek, spelled by someone who knows that "arroyo" is masculine).
livingdeb: (Default)
The longer we live, the more things we have to re-learn or unlearn. I feel more put out having to re-learn something I already learned once than learning something new, but a better strategy would be to feel glad to be living long enough to be having to/getting to expand my consciousness.

Old Knowledge

Sometimes knowledge goes bad by becoming untrue.
* I'm average height now. It no longer makes sense to refer to myself as short.
* Prices change. Back in my day, ...

Sometimes knowledge goes bad by losing some or all of its relevance.
* I know how to dial a rotary phone, carefully set the needle onto a record so it doesn't scratch, and rewind a tape when I'm done, but who cares?
* We still have other movie theatres, but I'm generally going to Alamo Drafthouse now when I can. (Except the South Lamar location; I hate that parking garage.)
* I often think of old friends who would be interested in something, but many of those people are no longer available to me.

Sometimes the old knowledge has always been bad; we just didn't realize it.
* racism, sexism, etc.
* word pronunciations I guessed wrong from reading the words

Sometimes our old knowledge is still true; it's just that there's more available now.
* We still have HEB, Wheatsville Coop, and Whole Foods, but we also have Trader Joes (and an additional bigger Wheatsville down south).
* Newtonian physics still works for some things, but now there's more.

New Knowledge

Sometimes the thing we're learning is not actually new; we just make a discovery.
* Thrift stores have things I like. Sometimes even dollar stores do.
* Ten-year-old cars in reliable models are much better than 2-year-old cars in models with average reliability (they are cheaper to buy, cheaper to maintain, and more reliable).
* When I suck at learning something, I can still learn it; it just takes me a while. (I like the term "slow learner." I'm a slower learner at foreign languages and things that require gross motor coordination like volleyball, ultimate frisbee, and ballroom dance.)
* The magic of compound interest (and the anti-magic of inflation).
* You get a diagnosis for a condition you've had for a long time. (See the book The Best Practices Journal for a fascinating example of that.)

Sometimes our old knowledge is just wrong and we finally figure that out. Sometimes we were just mistaken or ignorant; sometimes we were blatently lied to. So we want to try to unlearn the garbage and learn the truth.
* Fats don't actually cause weight gain (even though they have more calories per unit of weight than carbs and proteins); simple sugars are what we should minimize
* untrue prejudices

Sometimes the world changes, and we need to change, too.
* The book Eats, Shoots, and Leaves taught me that even the grammar and usage rules we learned in school can change.
* Austin no longer has Liberty Lunch or Les Amis, but it does have Alamo Drafthouse and Trader Joes.
* Smart phones now exist and are ubiquitous.
* Campbell's tomato soup is no longer delicious. (I think they add a lot more sugar now than when I was a kid.)
* Austin has roundabouts now, including at one of the two main exits of my neighborhood

Sometimes you, yourself change.
* We get potty-trained. (Go, Charlotte, you can do it!)
* We're big enough to not need a car seat, high chair, etc.
* Menstruation starts or ends.
* We get sick or injured or traumatized.
* We develop or lose an allergy.
* We gain or lose a bunch of weight.
* Our hair changes.
* We become vegetarian (or make some other voluntary dietary change).
* We change our way of doing something else (more recycling, less plastic, more frugality, less debt, etc.)
* We get a degree or other certification.

Sometimes there's a big change in your close environment. Almost the entire list of things that can cause stress (both good and bad things) apply.
* We get married, divorced, or widowed.
* We have kids or our kids leave home.
* We enter a new roommate situation.
* We get a new job and/or lose an old one.
* We move to a new house/city/country.

I'm adding a new tag, called new_tricks, for when I discuss examples of this.

Profile

livingdeb: (Default)
livingdeb

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 12:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios