livingdeb: (cartoon)
One of the exiting new side-effects of my job is that I'm turning into someone who interprets everything everyone else is doing as idiotic. Normally (and hopefully again in the future), I prefer to assume there's some good reason for what's going on, even if I can't see it. For example, that guy who just cut me off probably needs to get into the lane on the other side of me.

On campus, they very carefully tore one building down to replace it, making sure not to damage the building next to it. Not many months later, they carefully tore down the building next to it to replace it, making sure not to damage the new building next to it. Why didn't they save money by tearing down both at once?

After those were finished, an area used for construction supplies was replanted with grass. A couple of weeks later, all the grass was ploughed under, I assume so they can xeriscape it instead. Xeriscaping is a good idea--why did they plant grass?

The new, modernized degree audit system is being written on the mainframe. I just learned that my employer is now getting rid of all mainframe systems. We're not even done making this one yet. Are they going to use the same hard-won strategies in a new platform? (Hello, bug city.) Or are they going to scrap it all and go with the off-the-shelf PeopleSoft program?

There are two main ways that Texas public higher education institutions teach the six hours of required US government. Some teach a 3-hour class in US government and a 3-hour class in Texas government. UT teaches a 3-hour class in Texas and US government. Students then also choose one of multiple three-hour classes going into depth into various political issues. Some powers-that-be (I forget which and can't find the source) decided to stop funding the latter. After negotiations, they are only refusing to fund the latter at community colleges. a) I'm pretty sure professors love teaching the second half of the second sequence. b) UT did a lot of studies before choosing that method. c) What's with the inconsistency?

Sprint disallows updates on many Androids. Because they don't want to support all those updates. Even though people keep buying new Androids with new updates, so they have to support them anyway.

I don't like feeling that everyone's an idiot. It's no fun.

Articles of the Day

Today's articles are not about idiocy, but actual evil. Not the kind where they enjoy being evil, necessarily, but the kind where they are willing to do it for profit.

I've decided I need to get over the idea that modern advertisements are any less ridiculous than the hilariously crackpot ads from the 1800s. Just because we have some sort of truth-in-advertising laws doesn't mean they are enforced. I bet the following article is true:

Cracked.com's Six Products in Your Bathroom You won't Believe Don't Work - from #3, Anti-Aging Creams Will Age the Shit Out of You, "There are only two surefire ways to fight the aging process: time machines and death. But that hasn't stopped every cosmetics company from stocking drugstores, makeup counters, and back alleys with anti-wrinkle creams. And a shit-ton of those creams have chemical compounds called alpha hydroxy acids, which work by penetrating and exfoliating the top layer of skin. So old skin cells are shed and everyone walks away with a shiny baby face.

"Artist's interpretation of exfoliation. [photo of a guy shoveling snow]

"There's only one problem -- while burning off the top layer of your skin, AHAs are also creating thinned, weakened skin that's more susceptible to UV damage, which just happens to be a major cause of premature aging. Oh, and cancer. As more fine lines start showing up, the user is more likely to slather on the cream.

"It's a serious enough problem that the FDA has suggested that cosmetics companies put a warning label on their products. Cosmetics companies responded by laughing and giving the FDA the finger."

Why do they get to give the FDA the finger?

GMO Awareness's Monsanto's Dirty Dozen - on terminator seeds, "Monsanto’s latest technology produces sterile grains unable to germinate, forcing farmers to buy seeds from Monsanto year after year, rather than save and reuse the seeds from their harvest as they’ve been doing throughout centuries. To make matters worse, terminators can cross-pollinate and contaminate local non-sterile crops, which endanger the future seed supply, and thus ensures eventual control of the world’s food supply by Monsanto and the GM industry."

Sure, you can't enforce any laws without making them, so legislators still have to be bought. But who decides what laws to enforce? Not cops. They get to decide whether to be racist pigs, but they are not the ones deciding to imprison people who smoke pot for fun instead of people who are mucking with mother earth for profit.

World Truth TV's USDA Forces Whole Foods to Accept Monsanto - "WFM [Whole Foods Market] and most of the largest organic companies have deliberately separated themselves from anti-GMO efforts and cut off all funding to campaigns working to label or ban GMOs. ... The main reason, however, why Whole Foods is pleading for coexistence with Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta, BASF and the rest of the biotech bullies, is that they desperately want the controversy surrounding genetically engineered foods and crops to go away. Why? Because they know, just as we do, that 2/3 of WFM’s $9 billion annual sales is derived from so-called "natural" processed foods and animal products that are contaminated with GMOs."

If it's hard to find uncontaminated conventional foods, doesn't that make it all the more important to fight the good fight? What is this "Oh, well" reaction?

How do you even find out who to trust? Not Whole Foods. Maybe if you get too big, it's too hard to find good suppliers, so you have to go bad. Supposedly we can still trust organic labels.
livingdeb: (Default)
I went to Nerd Nite this month even though because it's February, the same month that has Valentine's Day in it, the theme is sex and dating. I went mainly because one of my friends was doing one of the presentations, but they all turned out to be fun. I don't know how people (especially nerds) get so confident on the stage, but just like last time I went, all three of the speakers were engaging.

“Steers and Queers: Sex Toy Laws in Texas,” by Julie Sunday

I don't care about sex toys myself, so I have not paid attention to laws about them. I figured the picture would be pretty grim. It turns out that it became much less grim in 2008.

Before 2008, it was illegal to sell or to promote (or give away) sex toys. However, it was not illegal to own them, so long as you had no more than five. (If you had more than five, you were obviously a distributor.)

What was considered a sex toy? Any device designed for the stimulation of human sexual organs. This means the electronic bull ejaculator was legal. It costs $1,500. Our speaker showed us a picture and said, "I don't even know what all those parts are." "Butt plugs" are also legal, since butts aren't sexual organs.

Even now, sex toys are sold as "novelties." That's because novelties are not regulated by organizations such as the Food and Drug Administration (which regulates other things that go in the body), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (which regulates children's toys and other products), or the Centers for Disease Control (which regulates other health related things).

Even now, phthalates, banned for use in children's toys, are still routinely used in sex toys (as well as shower curtains, raincoats and rubber boots). Toys made with phthalates, which help soften plastic, have a waxy look to them and a sweet vanilla sort of smell. Also, our speaker explained that they are "totally crappy and gross." They reduce sperm count in men and in future men (fetuses). The phthalates get absorbed through the skin, and the closer they are to the sex organs, the worse the problem is. Sex toys often get close to sex organs for some reasons. Our speaker recommended that if you have any toys made with this stuff, you should throw them away and get some better ones. She recommended hard toys, or, if you prefer soft ones, go for silicone.

She also mentioned that sex toys can be therapeutic for both sexes: orgasms relieve menstrual cramps and frequent ejaculation reduces the risk of prostate cancer.

Someone asked her if it was ever okay for a mother to give her daughter a sex toy, or is it only okay for the cool aunt to do. I liked her answer. She said just try not to train them that sex is dirty or disgusting, and they will find their own sex toys. There are plenty of ordinary children's toys that happen to vibrate, for example, such as a vibrating pen she used to have as a kid.

“The Mathematics of Dating,” By Sheena Madan

What's a good way to match people into stable couples? The stable marriage problem looks at the situation where you have the same number of heterosexual men and women, and each person can rank the members of the opposite gender.

The speaker described the stable marriage algorithm as being like the math of 1950's dating. First all the men go to the balconies of their number 1 pick and sing to them. Each woman with wooers chooses her favorite one. The next night, all the remaining men go to their number two pick, etc. In the end, all the people will be matched up and there will be no rogue couples. A rogue couple is made up of two people who both like each other better than the person they are with.

Then the speaker explained that she had done ten years of field research with this algorithm. First, in the description given above, are the marriages optimized for the men or the women? For the men--they get first pick. So the lessons from that are to a) hit on everyone, going down your list and b) have a thick skin (to handle any rejections).

The speaker's field research suggested that women should not use the "club and drag" technique. Instead, it's better to try flirting (she recommends the Social Issues Research Centre's Guide to Flirting).

Here's another lesson: don't settle. If you add to the stable marriage problem the idea that people can have standards, the result is that not all the people will be matched up. And this is a good thing. It's better to be single than to be in a bad marriage. So, you should be willing to reject, even if there's only one guy.

There are several problems with the model. One is that iterations can take a long time. One is that in real life there are influxes of new people. And one is that you can change your mind.

(To me, the biggest problem is that you don't have perfect information, and so you can't actually rank people properly.)

The speaker also recommends that if you find your soulmate through other means, ditch the algorithm and go with it.

There is a similar algorithm for many-to-one matches called the hospitals/resident algorithm.

An audience member suggested that a similar situation exists for employer/employee matches. (Interesting. That implies that jobs are optimized for the employee since we are the ones showing up at the employer balconies and they are stuck choose from us or going without.)

“An Introduction to Erotic Fan Fiction For Aspiring Writers,” by F*Bomb

Why write erotic fan fiction? Because it's easier than regular fiction. As with all fan fiction, you've already got characters and setting created for you. And with erotic fiction, you already know what the characters will be doing.

The speaker explained that the general rules of good writing apply. Show. Don't tell.

In addition, erotica is not porn. It's all about the crushes and the build-up. Tease and toy with your reader.

In addition, for fan fiction, do not introduce new characters. It's cheating. And for a TV show, especially, there are plenty of secondary characters to choose from if you need to.

Working with restrictions can help you be more creative.

The speaker was asked if there was a way to make money doing this. No. a) Fan fiction is based on shows that nerds like. In other words, shows that get canceled after two seasons. Shows that themselves don't make any money. b) Fan fiction tends to be pretty crappy.

Blog Entry of the Day - Setting the bar low: Suck less at What Now? This is about how sometimes setting the bar low can help you accomplish more than otherwise.
The beauty of this new mantra ["suck less"], I now realize, is that it makes my typical self-deprecation pointless. Today, for example, I was mostly a slug all morning and then took a nap in the afternoon, accomplishing essentially nothing for hours at a time. And under normal circumstances, this would send me into a spiral of shame about how good for nothing I am. But instead, when I woke up from my nap, I thought, "Well, I've sucked thus far today; now it's time to suck less." And I did. Was I amazingly productive afterward? Well, no. But did I suck less? Darn tootin'! And I'm much more cheerful for it.
livingdeb: (Default)
The totally awesome rewards-earning capabilities of my best rewards credit card are about to shrink. Effective October 30, they will be merely good. This happened to a lot of cards many months ago, but not mine, and I have been thankful. (Note to self: must stock up on gas, groceries and drugstore stuff before October 30.)

While I was reading the fine print to see if I could tell them that I refuse this change (hey, I've seen that sort of thing!), I found this scary phrase under "Right to Change/Modify/Cancel": "We reserve the right to alter or waive any Program feature or benefit [duh, I knew this] prospectively or retroactively, including, without limitation, participation fees, point accrual or redemption criteria, or to cancel or temporarily suspend the Program at any time without prior notice."

Prospectively or retroactively? Suddenly I want to look up prospectively in the dictionary: yep, that means in the future.

Participation fees? There aren't any. They could suddenly start charging some and making that retroactive? Wha?

(I already knew to cash in my points every time I have enough to do so. My program doesn't give me a bonus for holding out.)

I should refuse to hold such a card. Only I suspect that the scary-sounding thing is unenforceable. Well, I am going to assume so, anyway.

Profile

livingdeb: (Default)
livingdeb

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 09:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios