livingdeb: (cartoon)
Trump signed an executive order allowing the Dakota Access Pipeline to go through after all.

So what will that mean? And what's the big deal about anyway? Is the pipeline really just a big scheme for slimy profit-hungry rich guys to ram through another job (before demand gets so low that no one will pay them)? Is the protest just a bunch of whiny law-breaking anti-energy liberals and Native Americans who refuse to accept that they lost?

First, here are my biases:
* I am against adding infrastructure for fossils fuels when we should be switching to clean energy ASAP because of global warming.
* I am against anything that profits Trump.
* I am pro the Sioux protesters and their allies. Although the pipeline would not go through Sioux territory, it would go under the lake/river upstream of their territory. Any leaks into the water would affect them.

And, on the other side:
* I am pro-Canada. They're so nice!
* I drive using fossil fuels, and I buy goods that are transported to me via vehicles that use fossil fuels. Lower fuel prices mean lower prices on almost everything.

Today I found an interesting pro-pipeline site, Dakota Access Pipeline Facts that sure makes it look like the pipeline will be built of state-of-the art materials and that it will be buried pretty deeply (95 feet!) under the water. So that might mean that chances of a leak are actually small. I like that idea.

They also say that pipelines are safer than transport by truck or train. Which certainly makes sense. "[F]ederal statistics show that underground pipelines transport crude oil more safely than rail (3.4-4.5x safer), or trucks (34x safer). The Dakota Access Pipeline can replace rail and truck transportation of crude oil with less impact to the environment and statistically greater safety." Does that just mean that spills are less likely? Or does it also mean that even when you add up all the damages of all the spills, the damages per gallon-mile transported are smaller for pipelines? I can't tell.

I mean, Wikipedia has a List of Pipeline Accidents, and there are quite a few of them and, more importantly, the leaks tend to be very, very big, in spite of any 24/7 monitoring. So I'm glad they're at least trying to build a high-quality pipeline.

Interestingly, in an e-mail I received today, Duncan Meisel of 350.org says:

[President Trump] did *not* approve Keystone XL or Dakota Access. He briefly succeeded in confusing a lot of people on this point (including me, I will admit).
* On Dakota Access, he told the Army Corps of Engineers that the pipeline is in our "national interest" and told them to "consider" revoking the environmental review placed on it by the Obama Administration.
* On Keystone XL, he invited TransCanada to re-apply and if they do, mandated a final decision on the pipeline within 60 days and waived input from environmental agencies.
* And when TransCanada does re-apply, they no longer have permits in Nebraska, and their permits in South Dakota are being challenged.
* Trump also placed conditions on approval of the pipelines -- like limiting oil exports, and determining where the steel comes from -- that the oil companies might not accept.


Meisel's sources are the National Resources Defense Council's Significant Obstacles Remain in Building Keystone XL and Earth Justice's The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's Litigation on the Dakota Access Pipeline.

I saw an interview (Cornyn: We'll Confirm Trump's SCOTUS Nominations 'One Way or the Other') with one of my Senators. He tries to seem very reasonable. For example, he says to do the environmental reviews and if they pass, start building the pipeline already. But he also said the Native Americans "presented their case in a court of law, and to my knowledge, the court sided with the Core of Engineers and those who wanted to build the pipeline. So everybody's going to have to comply with lawful court orders and the law of the land. They're entitled to their day in court, but once they lost, they need to go ahead and go along with the court's order."

However, according to this timeline, it looks like the case has not yet been decided. What they lost was their request for "a preliminary injunction" which they wanted because the pipeline was "already under construction and would be finished before the case could be formally decided." That is quite different.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I just read something interesting today over at The Simple Dollar: Light Bulb Showdown: LED vs. CFL vs. Incandescent. Holly Johnson says, "they’re now available for about $8 a bulb on Amazon [$54.98 for a 6-pack of Cree 9.5-watt (60w) LED * 6 Pack * - Soft/warm White (2700k) Light Bulb]. IKEA sells its own 60W-equivalent LED light bulbs for just $5 [$4.49 for a LEDARE LED bulb E26, dimmable, globe opal], and Home Depot is reportedly running a promotion in May that will discount Philips LED light bulbs to as low as $2.50 per bulb."

(I can't find additional information on the Home Depot promotion, even though it's May tomorrow, but I do recall reading that Home Depot has some light bulbs that are subsidized by my city.)

So if you've been putting off getting these, now might be a good time financially. Also, summer is coming, so if you live somewhere hot, it might be nice to switch to some lightbulbs that don't emit heat.

I've heard mixed reviews of LEDs over the years and have started keeping track of people's favorable reviews.

In October of 2013, MMM recommended GE Energy Smart LEDs--"the first LED bulbs I found with a sufficently good "color rendering index" to make the food look tasty, and thus they finally allowed me to remove the power-hungry halogens." But his current recommendations page lists LED Waves which he reviewed in March 2012, but then updated at a later point to include those bulbs. But he likes a really focused light and I like an uncultured widely dispersed light. Why, yes, I do like overhead fixtures! (I've read that overhead fixtures are a terrible way to light up your house and instead you should have millions of spotlights in the areas where you actually like to look at things like paintings and work surfaces. Apparently I am not supposed to like to look at my whole house, like bookshelves, the inside of cabinets, or the floor I'm walking across.)

In January of 2014, Financial Ramblings liked Cree's warm white bulbs. "They immediately reach full brightness, they put out a ton of light (800 lumens/bulb), and both the color and light dispersion are fantastic. Oh, and they use marginally less electricity than an equivalent CFL (9.5W vs. 13W)."

In March 2015, Trent Hamm from The Simple Dollar liked LE's A60 E26 bulbs to replace 75-watt bulbs and Triangle's candalabra-based bulbs for ceiling fans.

In November, 2014, Miser Mom posted that she had noticed that a lot of light bulbs don't actually last as long as they're supposed to, so they don't save you money after all. Unless you save your receipts (she saves hers in an envelope in the box where she keeps her new light bulbs) and keep track of which bulbs are how old (she writes the installation date on the bulb itself when she installs it). Then you can negotiate a refund or replacement bulb.

Warning: one of the CREE reviewers on Amazon says, "Cree has stated that they will not honor their warranty for Amazon purchases, unless the seller sends you their receipt from Home Depot!"

The weird thing I want is bulbs that are equivalent to 40 watts instead of the usual 60; most of our overhead light fixtures involve two or three light bulbs.

My current plan is to see what's up at the Home Depot that is walking distance from my house tomorrow. I'm hoping to find the 40-watt equivalent Cree light bulbs.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
Because of the rising popularity of fracking, I've decided to get earthquake insurance.

The cost

I was hoping it would be cheap because earthquakes are (currently) basically unheard of here, and it is cheap. It's costing me $38 per year.

This is for the same type of coverage as the rest of my homeowner's insurance, so (I'm hoping) it's full coverage but with a high deductible ($6675) to keep my premium costs down. I can cover a few thousand dollars (and small claims only raise your rates, so there's no point in making them). But I could not financially handle my house collapsing, at least not easily.

On fracking

My old boyfriend, CS, had a textbook in the 1980s that explained that one method of getting rid of toxic waste, deep-well injection, was found to lead to earthquakes, so it was no longer used.

Well, it's not the 1980s anymore. Although fracking similarly involves injecting stuff deep into the earth, they get to do it anyway. Because this new form of natural gas extraction is so valuable, people are working on how to balance gas extraction with actual earthquake damage. For details, the print article Fracking and Earthquakes: Exploring the Connection has a fascinating and readable summary of the situation.

My state loves fracking and hates regulation (of energy companies among other things). And although I am not on a known fault line, there is a one running right through my city. Scientists may figure out good limits which politicians may then enforce. But I'm not holding my breath. So I sign petitions and have insurance.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
Remember how I was comparing my spending to that of a couple of personal finance bloggers who published their spending for 2014? Well I decided to look into home energy and water costs as well.

me
* natural gas - $327
* electricity/trash/water - $2154
* total = $2482

Eco Cat Lady
* gas/electric - $1188
* water - $222
* total = $1410 (57% of what I pay)

Mr. Money Mustache
* electricity/gas/water - $1614 (65% of what I pay)

It sure looks like there is a lot of room for improvement! Of course, those two other guys do not have my same situation. They both live somewhere cold, but that just means they spend way more on heating and way less on air conditioning than I do. Eco Cat Lady has a small house like mine; Mr. Money Mustache's is bigger and holds three people. Yes, I should be able to do better as well.

But how much better? Some of my costs are fixed. I decided to find out how much.

My last City of Austin utilities bill was $129.57 for electricity, water, wastewater, trash pick-up, and other random city services. This is super low because we are in the middle of winter. Fixed costs were about $58.03. I say "about" because it's not totally black and white. This number includes:
* a tiered fixed charge of $3 for water--if we were in the first tier instead of the second, this could be less
* a trash can charge of $5.10--this is lower than for bigger trash cans, but last time I checked, we had the smallest one possible
And I am not including the 1% tax on electricity which is based on both fixed and variable expenses.

My last Texas Gas Service bill was $35.77 for natural gas (a little bigger than usual because it's winter). Of this, $20.06 was not based on usage. Again, this figure is problematic because it includes several small charges which seem to change randomly from month to month.

Still, my total annual cost just to be allowed to have these services even if I use nothing at all looks to be about $937 ($78/month). (And here is where I remind myself that it's not cheap keeping the power lines up after all our storms, dealing with tree roots growing into pipes, and driving those behemoth trash and recycling trucks all over town repeatedly.)

That fixed-cost total is 2/3 of Eco Cat Lady's total expenses and 58% of Mr. Money Mustache's. So it's not the case that my fixed costs are greater than their total costs. So that's a relief. (Unless I was in the mood to be whiny.) My original notion that there is room for improvement by adopting more of their strategies appears sound.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
At craft night I learned that micro-inverters let you install a solar panel system where when one panel is shaded it does not reduce the effectiveness of the other panels. This changes everything.

And apparently I am not the only home owner who has decided that I would rather have trees than solar panels. Now you can have some of both.

I don't have the energy/time right now to look into this again, but it's on my list for later.

Language-learning video of the day - How to Talk Minnesotan. I bet you thought this was going to be about Spanish, eh? But, no, I am a complex and unpredictable individual! Occasionally.

This video is almost thirty minutes of fake-retro amusing deadpan instruction which has the feel of even being sort of true. By which I mean I actually do feel like I could blend in a little better than I normally would.

From Lesson One: "These three workhorses of Minnesota conversation will carry you through your first scary hours. In fact, they should be good for a week, if you only speak if spoken to, which is always a good idea anyway. Memorise them. Work on them at home with your family. Repeat them until they're second nature. They're the building blocks of all dialog." He's talking about these sentences:
* You bet.
* That's different.
* Whatever.

As I commented in the post that introduced it to me: "Learning a bit more about how to speak Minnesotan wasn’t too bad. I’ve laughed less."
livingdeb: (Default)
PV cells

The photovoltaic (PV) cell is the basic unit of solar arrays. Most are made of silicon which is made as pure as possible and then doped with boron on one side and phosphorous on the other. The boron side faces the top where the sunlight (photons) enter. It has excess electrons which are given off when the photons hit it. The phosphorous side is starving for electrons and is attached to a back layer. A wire run from the front to the back can power something.

The first PV cells were made of a slice of a single silicon crystal. This crystal cannot be cut at right angles and still preserve its important properties, so it is typically shaped like a square with the corners cut off. These cells have an efficiency of 20%. These are still the most popular and have been seen to work for 50 years. These have the highest cost per watt.

PV cells can also be made from multiple slices fused together. These are cheaper to make but are a little less efficient (13 - 16%). They can be cut at right angles and are generally rectangular. These are newer but have still been seen to work for 20 years. These cost less per watt.

Panels

PV cells are put together in rows and columns into modules (panels). Monochrystalline silicon modules are dark blue with gridlines and white diamonds (where the corners were cut off). Polychrystalline silicon modules are a brighter blue with thicker gridlines.

Modules can also be made from a thin film of either amorphous silicon with no chrystalline structure (A-Si), or Cadmium-Telluride (Cd-Te) or CIGS among other things. These are still less efficient (6-7%). These have the lowest cost per watt but require more area and much more wiring. They are flexible and see-through so they can be used for windows, awnings, and skylights. And they work better in shade than the other two types. The Cd-Te and CIGS types have no silicone which was good during the period when refining capacity was maxed out, but more capacity has since been built.

Panels are strong. All can handle 1-inch hail at 60 mph; most, golfball-sized hail at 90 mph. They are stronger than a composition shingle roof. Baseball-sized hail can take it out, though. But this can be covered by homeowner's insurance. Modules do degrade by about 1/2% efficiency per year. Maintenance is easy and involves hosing them down occasionally.

Racking

Most (90%) systems are roof-mounted and of these, 90% are flat-mounted. They are attached to rails which, in turn, are attached to the roof. For composition roofs, bolts must go through the roof into the rafters (load-bearing joists) with a lag bolt to protect against the wind. Flashing or neoprene mastic is then used to protect the roof from leaks.

Solar panels can also go on Spanish tile roofs, but it's very labor intensive (takes three times as long) and involves pulling up most of the tiles. They are easiest to install on standing-seam (metal) roofs because they can be attached directly to the seams with no roof penetration at all.

They can also be pole mounted (expensive, but you get free shade) or ground mounted (cheap, but probably doesn't work in urban settings because of shade problems and because you probably have other uses for your ground). You can put them on carports and solar awnings.

Steel racking leads to expansion issues (solar panels are framed in aluminum) and rusting. It's much better to use extruded aluminum designed for solar panels. It costs a tiny bit more at first, but then it will be trouble-free.

Conduit

The wires must go through metal (not PVC) conduit and this must be on top of your roof (not in your attic). This is to protect firefighters who might need to climb on your roof and chop through it with an axe at which time they do not want to connect with your electricity.

DC disconnect

There's a place to turn off the power.

Inverter

The inverter converts the DC current from the panels to the AC current used in your house.

This is the weakest link in the system. Therefore, make sure you get one with at least a 10-year warranty. (SMA is best. Fronius is also great and a little cheaper.) Inverters hate the sun. Therefore, it's good to install yours in the garage and terrible to install it on a south-facing wall. They can actually handle heat up to 120 degrees, but they are not good with direct sunlight. At the very least, put an awning over it.

AC disconnect

There's another place to turn off the power which our instructor called expensive and pointless. The idea is that repair people can easily find this box and turn it off, but in reality they never actually use these boxes. That's probably because grid-tied systems are designed to stop producing power in blackouts and brownouts to protect repair workers.

[It is possible to build a hybrid system with a bypass to batters to run the fridge and other critical things--not the air conditioning, but it's expensive ($1000 - 3000 just for the batteries) so it would be better to get a whole-house generator ($400 - $500 for a 4 kW generator) if you want power during blackouts.]

PV meter

The inverter actually has a meter, but it can be 5% off. Therefore, grid-tied installations also have a revenue-grade meter.

Electric panel

The system is tied to your panel. It needs two slots at the bottom (with your main/grid power at the top). If you install a solar panel system, your electrical system will have to be brought up to code. (I can tell based on various things that people laughed about in class that our 55-year-old electrical system would require a fair amount of work in this area.)

Utility Meter

Grid-tied systems are connected to your meter.

Questions

I had a few additional questions when I went in that were also answered.

What happens with the solar panels outlast the roof? Solar installers are hired to disassemble the system, then roofers can re-roof the house, then the solar installers reassemble the system. (I put in 30-year composition tiles, expected to last 23 years in Austin, 14 years ago. I want my next roof to be metal so that it is also my last roof. I should probably wait until I do that before installing solar panels.)

Can you mix and match module types, say, to put film panels in the oft-shaded areas and more efficient panels in the other areas or to add on to your system? Not really. Being in series, they need to have the same current. However, you could put them on different inverters.

Any other questions? Ask me, I might actually know the answer.

Blog entry of the day especially for my vocabulary lovers: Manly Slang from the 19th Century - "Gullyfluff. The waste—coagulated dust, crumbs, and hair—which accumulates imperceptibly in the pockets of schoolboys." I think fraeuleinchen will like most of them, such as scandal-water: "Tea; from old maids’ tea-parties being generally a focus for scandal." Raaga123 might like follow-me-lads, "Curls hanging over a lady’s shoulder." Chikuru might like hobbadehoy, "A youth who has ceased to regard himself as a boy, and is not yet regarded as a man." I think I like bully trap, "A brave man with a mild or effeminate appearance, by whom the bullies are frequently taken in."
livingdeb: (Default)
Robin and I went to an informal class on designing and installing solar panel systems this weekend. We are not now prepared to actually install a system, but we learned a fabulously huge amount of stuff that will help us make good decisions when/if we hire someone to do this.

The first presenter, Doug Soester (pronounced SOY-ster) gave us an amazing amount of information at all levels from basic physics to what he thinks about state-of-the-art microinverters.

Shade

If you're interested in getting a solar system, you will need accessible shade-free areas. Generally, you are looking for a portion of south-facing roof that is free of shade from 9 am to 3 pm (or at least six solid hours) every day of the year. Ruinous shade may be cast by nearby buildings, trees, your chimney, or even your vent pipes.

You can get a quick and dirty measure by looking at your roof at 9 am, noon, and 3 pm on a clear winter day (even as late in the year as right now). You can get a perfect measure on any day during daylight hours using a Solar Pathfinder at all potential points of your rooftop. Its domed lid reflects all potentially shade-causing items. The chart beneath shows you which times of day during which parts of the year these obstructions will be causing shade at the spot where you're standing. It's totally cool and totally $200.

Solar panels are typically connected in series, like Christmas tree lights. If even one part of one panel is shaded, your total output could be reduced by over 80%.

Orientation

Ideally, your solar panels are always facing the sun. In real life, look for the best fixed location. Facing due south is a compromise between morning and afternoon sun positions that produces the maximum daily energy yield. But if you are selling excess electricity to your local power company and if they charge more during peak periods (as Austin might start doing in about 2 years), a more westerly direction will maximize your profits. Any orientation within 45 degrees of due south is acceptable by incentive programs.

The sun's path is lower in the sky in winter than in summer. Facing the same angle as your latitude (30 degrees in Austin) is the compromise that maximizes total energy production. But since energy costs tend to be higher (here, anyway) in summer than in winter, you might want your angle to be a bit flatter to maximize profit. In summer, 15 degrees is ideal in Austin. In practice, most systems are flush-mounted, and you will go with whatever your actual roof angle is. Your panels can be installed at a different angle, but a structural engineer will have to get involved to make sure that wind uplift doesn't become a problem. Also, you don't want the uplifted ends of some panels shading any of your other panels. Anything from 0 to 50 degrees can work.

So long as your orientation and tilt lead to energy production within 90% of optimal (or 80% in some places), your project can qualify for incentives.

Panels

How many panels can you fit in your space? Panels are generally installed in rows along a single surface, each panel having a portrait rather than landscape orientation. Panels are typically 80 watts and about 2 feet by 4 feet.

Yield

Now that you know these things, you can estimate what your cost savings would be using PV Watts calculator (use version 1). You need to enter the size of your system (typically 3-4 kW), your orientation, your roof's pitch, your location, and the amount your utility charges per kWh.

Incentives

Our city has a rebate program, our state is about to have some kind of program, and I think there may be federal tax incentives. In my town, the payback period is down to about 10 years. Our city will let us run the meter backward, but for any month one produces more energy than one consumes, we get paid only the fuel charge rate for the energy. Different parts of the country have vastly different economic factors.

My house

I have no idea what part of the roof is shaded--the two closest trees have come down, so it's less than before. We have extremely little south-facing roof, probably not enough for a single panel, so we'd probably go with a west-facing roof (if there aren't too many vent pipes). I think the instructor said that the roof angle of a typical ranch house has a pitch of 20 degrees. My preliminary guess is we could get a system with an efficiency of 89% of ideal. We get lots of sun here, but prices are low. I need to do more research.
livingdeb: (Default)
I got my highest utility bill ever (for me) today. And I did it with:
* a high-efficiency central air conditioner
* a nice three-month AC air filter that I replace monthly
* turning the AC off all day while we go to work, even though it's 86 in the house when we get home
* never cooling the house below 75 degrees
* plenty of insulation
* solar screens on all the windows
* solar film on some windows
* curtains, blinds, and/or tin foil on most windows
* the lightest color roof shingles my roofer offered
* mostly fluorescent light bulbs
* a low-flow shower head

It was kind of boiling hot every single day, as if it were August, and we did water a million tomato plants, and I'm still working on re-growing those fallen shade trees, but still.
livingdeb: (Default)
Energy Star has what looks like a really good refrigerator energy usage comparison calculator. (Yikes, five nouns in a row! I'm so glad English is my first language, geez.)

It looks good because you can enter your exact refrigerator model and the exact amount you pay for electricity from your bill. When I do that, it tells me that I would cut my energy use in half and thus can save about $2 per month if I replace my awesome but twelve-year-old refrigerator with a new Energy Star refrigerator.

Interestingly, they say that my current refrigerator uses 688 kilowatt hours per year, but the big yellow sticker that came with my refrigerator says that it uses 598 kilowatt hours per year. I've come up with four possible reasons for this which are not mutually exclusive:
* Energy measuring methods have been improved, thus leading to different figures.
* My refrigerator is expected to have lost some efficiency over the years.
* Energy Star is deliberately overestimating the energy use of my old refrigerator to try to get me to buy a new one.
* The original figure was deliberately underestimated to try to entice me into buying that model.

Regardless, I am in no hurry to trade up.

That's even though my city will pay $50 to recycle an old but working refrigerator. I'd rather hang on to mine until it doesn't work and lose the $50. At a new refrigerator cost of $1000 earning only 2% interest, it would take only 2.5 years of putting off replacing my refrigerator to earn $50 anyway. Supposedly refrigerators last 15 years on average. Some of the more affordable new low-energy refrigerators are having trouble with their compressing going out prematurely.

However, part of me thinks that recessions are a good time to look for bargains in expensive things like Energy Star refrigerators.

One more relevant piece of data is that our next refrigerator will probably be bigger. Our current one is 18.5 cubic feet, which is on the small end of normal. It's located at the end of a counter, so we can fit in a new one of any width. We'd probably like to move up to at least 21 cubic feet which might just about cancel out any energy savings anyway.

Programming update - I have now completed nine of the twenty-four hours in my programming book. Everything still seems to make perfect sense, which is good.

I remember when I took a workshop on Javascript, I got totally lost during the discussion about array variables. They are just variables that have multiple data values such as test scores for 30 students. In that case, you might name the variable TestScore and the score for the first student would be at TestScore(1) and the score for the second student at TestScore(2), etc. What could be easier? But I seem to remember they were trying to use multi-dimensional ones, not one-dimensional ones like this one. Which means they could hold multiple test scores for each person. Um, still doesn't seem hard. Maybe it had four dimensions and they didn't explain well how to keep track of them. I don't know.

Profile

livingdeb: (Default)
livingdeb

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 10:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios