Community

Sep. 11th, 2006 10:50 pm
livingdeb: (Default)
This October's Prevention magazine has an article called "Find Your Own Happiness: Never settle for less than what you want with these research-tested routes to a brighter future by Joan Borysenko, PhD. One of the seven steps to happiness she mentions is community involvement:

Become part of a community
Whether you're deeply involved with a religious group, a civic organization, or an athletic team, a feeling of strong community is one of the most important paths to happiness. One of the perks of living in my small town is that simply taking a walk is a community experience. I know my neighbors care about me, and they know that I care about them.


I have seen several of these communities. As a grown-up, the first one that really hit me was ultimate frisbee (a high-energy team sport with an unusually high fairness ethic). I once volunteered to let a new ultimate-playing grad student stay at my house while I was hunting for a paying roommate and he was hunting for a more permanent place to live. This guy was a very good player and played tournaments across the country. He talked about how wherever he went, he could always find a place to stay. I was a little bit jealous of his connections, not to mention his ultimate skills. I do not belong to this community, although I do visit from time to time.

My sister has this same kind of deal going on with the SCA (Society for Creative Anachronism, a historical participation group focusing on the Medieval period). She really got into it when she was in a military town where you are an oddity if you get married before you're even pregnant. If I had lived there, I would have joined the SCA, too. But since I live in Austin, where there is actually more than one fun thing to do, I haven't. She has that same thing where she can have an instant connection with people all across (mostly English-speaking) countries. She found her husband there.

A family friend is also in the SCA community, although he does live in a cool town. He finds that he can practice all his favorite hobbies there: guitar playing and singing, story telling, dressing up, play fighting, and probably other things I no longer remember. He met at least his first wife there.

I have a friend who deliberately joined a church, at least partly for the Machiavellian purpose of having, basically, insurance. If you belong to a church and you are in trouble, then you will have a place to get help (even beyond your own family and friends).

My parents and paternal grandparents became very involved in their synagogues for almost purely social reasons. (I mean, Grandma would make ham for Passover.) all took on major roles such as President of the Sisterhood or Newsletter Editor. Mom and Dad also help with building repair and renovation, curtain and other textile creation, fund raisers, P R, and weekly challah (bread in the shape of a braid) baking.

There's an online journaling community which I haven't quite jumped into. You can go to JournalCon in a new city every year, and there are groups of bloggers that meet regularly in many cities, including mine, I believe. There's even an online chat group I hang out in (3WA, for those who know it), but I quit being a member when payment was required because I am a cheapskate and didn't want to spend too much of my time there.

I suspect some regular writers belong to a similar community. I saw hints of community with nanowrimo and I used to go to a monthly meeting of people in my neighborhood interested in writing.

There's a folk dancing community around here, which I used to frequent and which an old roommate hangs around a lot. You can go to different dances virtually every night of the week. She freaked out a little when one of the dancers expressed concern that she had missed some events by telling her that she should get her priorities straight. My friend thought that she did have her priorities straight because there is more to life than folk dancing.

I am afraid that this is how I have felt about communities so far. I do not currently have any of these connections. I am not religious. I haven't volunteered (Red Cross, Girl Scouts) in years. I haven't gotten sucked in that deeply into ultimate frisbee or writing or even ballroom dancing. I don't even know my neighbors.

It's partly because I have more than one hobby. But there are also some creepy elements involved like not wanting to be beholden to too many people, a distaste for stalkers, and what one person calls my fierce independence. I don't really think I can be independent, but I do like not having to rely on any particular person or group for my happiness. I may also have a fear of spending too much energy in one area either because I'm afraid I will lose all my other interests, or I will become a self-centered person who thinks she is better than everyone in some area.

For example, in ballroom dance, I thought for a while that it might not actually be possible to get good without becoming icky. The best people seemed to dance only with good people (and when you're female, that meant clawing your way past the other females to the scarce males). And they looked at themselves in the mirror a lot (to check their form).

But I have been able to get relatively good without forgetting that the whole point is to have fun. In fact just this weekend I went out of my way to dance a few dances with a guy sitting by himself. I learned that he's a beginner, but nice and not at all slimy. When a merengue came on, I decided that he needed to be introduced to the magic. So I walked up to him and said, "You probably don't realize it, but you know this dance." I showed him the basic, which is one step to the side and another step to bring the feet back together, with hips moving. And I showed him the other basic which is just walking in any direction with hips moving. I showed him some arm-twirly bits to throw in, told him to add any other moves he knew from other dances, and then turned over the leading to him. My plan totally worked--based on my experience dancing with him, this might now be his best dance. At the end he asked me, "What was the name of that dance again?"

I'm not competition grade, though. I can't even really dance with my friend-of-a-friend B who has been seriously dancing with an official partner and is now awesome. Of course, the partner is known as "the dragon lady," which only supports my fear that getting good is not enough fun.

Another problem is that the one group that I really feel comfortable and happy hanging with is computer geeks. But I hate programming, computer research, computer maintenance, etc. It's just that I like the kinds of brains that people who are attracted to those things have, and I like so many of the other things they do with those fabulous brains. I've never hit it off or felt totally comfortable like that in a group of ultimate players, Girl Scout leaders, ballroom dancers, folk dancers, writers, SCAdians, or any other group I've seen.

And so although I look wistfully at the community experiences other people are having, and am on the lookout for such a thing myself, I don't currently have it. For now I have a small group of good friends, and several groups of other people I enjoy interacting with (friends-of-friends, dancers, bloggers, co-workers, etc.).

P.S. I know that around here, a surprising proportion of both ballroom dancers and ultimate players are computer folks. But some ballroom dancers are there for the touching, which is fine, but they are too desperate or otherwise creepy about it. And I have been totally turned off several times by ultimate players who have no respect for, well, me. Even in gatherings where they are pretending to be open-minded, they still really only want to play with people who are good. And even in an environment where all the women can kick my butt, and so I would really rather guard some of the men, they are so sexist that they still make me guard other women because to them "woman" is a synonym for "bad player that we have to have at least three of on our team because this is a co-ed league."
livingdeb: (Default)
Today Robin and I went to a Dips and Tricks workshop put on by the university's ballroom dance club.

Fortunately, although the teachers did not emphasize leading, following, or fitting the moves into dances, they did seem to feel that doing these moves safely was a priority.

Warning: the following notes are not enough for you to learn these things. If you insist on trying them anyway and you sue me, you will only get a fifteen-year-old car and, um, this laptop computer I'm using right now, and you'll never get to read any more of my blogs again. (My fictional lawyer recommends trying this only on a king-sized bed your first time. Also my fake lawyer says jump--ahem--scroll to the last paragraph before the asterisks for things you can take away with you.)

We learned something called a lean, which looks a bit gravity-defying. Basically the leader lunges to one side while holding the follower on his other side. Both are facing the same direction, though at the height of the lean, they might look at each other. This does not look as cavemanish as I'm making it sound.

Important safety notes: The leader bends his outside leg only; the rest of him stays straight. The leader holds the follower tightly to his side. The follower does not throw herself against the leader but waits until he starts leaning (yes, she "follows").

Interesting things we noticed: Leaning pretty far makes it more likely that my feet slip out from underneath me; I definitely end up on only part of only one foot. It's best to have my weight balanced on the man's side rather than allowing myself to slide down his front.

Things we were told during the one-on-one portion: Use the J lead (or J-hook?). Rather than pulling the follower in at the beginning, moving his arm straight back toward him, the leader should drop his hand a bit and then move it in the shape of a "J." I don't exactly understand.

Next we learned the around-the-world. In this dip, the leader displays the woman's throat to anyone who might be looking. Oh, I'm not making that sound so great, either. The dancers get into full closed position, the leader twists his upper body to the left, then he bends his knees while the follower leans back, then the leader twists to the right, sweeping the follower in a semicircle around him, and then pulls the follower back up.

Important safety notes: The dancers must start together so that the follower is as close to the man's center of gravity as possible. The leader bends his knees to help him stay balanced. The leader holds the follower tightly and relatively low on her back. The follower does not lean back until the leader sends her back. The follower does not bend her knees (much) so her back won't hurt too much. The leader should lean back, counterbalancing the follower, not forward, following her to the floor.

Things we noticed: Leaning my head back and swinging in a circle is a recipe for a headache. The dancers' shoulders should be about one follower's armlength from each other. Start with weight on one food and end with it on the other.

Things we were told: The follower really is supposed to bend her neck backwards during this.

The last thing we learned was the death drop. The leader brings the follower close to him, then flings her to the floor, almost.

Safety tips: The leader must not lean forward. (Okay, they didn't tell us this, but it's true.) The leader must change hand grips while bringing the follower to him, then take her other hand in the same strong grip. The partners need to stay close so that the follower stays as close to the leader's center of gravity as possible. The follower should not start dropping until the leader leads it. If the leader does not feel ready, he should abort the move; even un-doing what you have started still looks like an interesting move. The leader must not straighten his arms fully with a new partner. (Oops, I didn't know your arms were that long.) The follower should sneak her inside foot underneath her so that she can support much of her own weight and do much of the work in bringing her back up. The follower should keep her body as straight as possible (except for that one leg) and never lean her head back.

Things we noticed: our arms are not so long that we can't straighten them (with each other, anyway). It's hard to slide my foot past his. I should bend that foundation leg more.

Things we were told: nothing; ran out of time.

You, my readers can come away with a few valuable generalizations. Don't do anything that requires you to trust someone without first getting a signal from that person that they are prepared for you to trust them. It's easier to keep your balance if you carry heavy loads close to your center of balance and bend your knees.

**

At work another tool I need broke, but then it was fixed only hours later. When you can't do any of your duties, so they just build and build beyond your control, it gets frustrating. Oh, well, I can always get more delegated to me.

Meanwhile, there seems to be a general philosophy that we should spend all our energy making everything prettier, and there are so many things that are so ugly that we don't have time to also improve any functionality while we are messing with it. New cube walls with less storage. New web page design with same old text and lack of functionality. New online forms that are just copies of the paper forms created decades ago. We're going to hire a new bossman soon, an his boss does not have this mentality, so it's quite possible that things will improve within the next year.

**

In the book I'm reading I'm still not learning much. I could go into a long list of negatives, but that gets tiresome. The one thing he's said that's struck a chord with me is that we should try to take more control of our cash flow. This way we have much more freedom. If our money is coming from working for someone else, that someone else is in control. If it's coming from stocks, we have no control over the company. He recommends owning your own business, and buying property from which you can collect rent.

I won't be taking any of his extremely minimal specific advice. For example, if I'm getting money from a company, I want someone who knows what they're doing to be in charge of that company, not me. And if you have your own business, you still have to do what your customers want, not just what you want. And if you're charging rent, you still have no control over the economy or even the property market in the area.

And I have no interest at all in starting businesses until I get it right or buying properties until I learn how to do that right. I'd much rather have the freedom to not have to do that.

I'm more comfortable taking control of my spending rather than my earning (of course, since any monkey can do that--dang, I wasn't going to go into all these negatives). But that doesn't mean I shouldn't try to increase my choices in income-producing methods. Here are some methods I'm using now.

1) Have job with amazing pension, which gives me great freedom later. Although this pension is invested in stocks and bonds, just like some of my other, there are additional pressures to pay us anyway somehow.

2) Have additional savings so I don't have to rely on my pension and Social Security so much.

3) Buy a house and pay it off. Then I'll only have to pay taxes and insurance, which should be cheaper than rent, right?

4) If I move to a different house, keep this house and rent it out because rent really feels like a different basket (than the stocks and bonds baskets) to put some eggs into.

5) Have some stocks because in the long run, they're bound to exceed inflation; also capital gains and dividends are taxed at lower rates than earned income.

6) Have some money in a Roth IRA so that some taxes are already paid ahead of time. If (when) taxes go wacko, I can have some money that can no longer be taxed. Except via sales tax and property tax and any other non-income tax. Oh, well.

7) Have some money in inflation-indexed thingies in case inflation goes wacko.

8) Have ideas for extra ways to make money. I've done "consulting" as a typist, transcriptionist, and tutor of elementary college statistics. And I'm high on a list of people called for teacher certification test scoring. I really should think of more things like this and do them. I think I might be able to sell the occasional magazine article.

9) Keep expenses low so that the assets I do have can last a while, even if events outside my control shrink my finances.

And there is one warning from the book that I am taking to heart. The author mentions that within certain investment vehicles you don't have much flexibility. Specifically, in 401K plans, you can't take your money out early without paying huge fees, even if the stock market crashes. But you do have to start taking money out at age 70.5, even if the stock market is crashing. One of my mutual funds is with a company that has many other options. But I need to educate myself on my options in my Roth IRA. I bet it takes days or weeks to transfer money from one fund to another--it would be nice to at least know the procedure sometime before I need it.
livingdeb: (Default)
I really don't know what to write today.

Robin took me to a Chinese restaurant today that he'd learned about from his co-workers. This restaurant has the best dumplings (pot-stickers) he's ever tasted. (Get the pan-fried pork ones. I don't remember what it's called, but if you head south on MoPac, take the Far West exit, and look for it on the right before you get to Far West, it's the building with a Chinese restaurant name as opposed to an office building name or an apartment complex name.) Their other food was pretty good, too--not too greasy, and the meat was not fatty, gristly, or tough.

We watched the movie "My Life Without Me." I liked it. It had a couple of wonderful surreal touches. And the main character made different decisions than I would have, but then these decisions are well explained and make sense for her.

I also went ballroom dancing where I sat out almost continuously for over an hour, then danced almost continuously for another hour, then a little more sitting and little more dancing and it was all over. The high point was when B. was too hot to dance, so I handed him a fan, so he danced (the rumba) with the fan. Every time we split up while I did an underarm turn or while we were doing cuban walks, so he had a free hand, he fanned himself. At one point R. thought this was unfair and ran up to give me a fan of my own. That was great (although I didn't take the fan).
livingdeb: (Default)
Yesterday I asked my dance instructor the secret to his incredible footwork, especially in mambo (a very fast dance). He gave me two secrets.

The first one is to never put weight on your foot until your body is over it.

This reminds me of what I learned in volleyball--don't even try to return a volleyball until you can get your whole body directly under it. I learned it mainly because people yelled this at me whenever I had a terrible pass, which was at least half the time for a while, and also because it did actually make it easier to make the ball go where I aimed. (This group was not easy to play with, and some days my ego wasn't up for it, but it could also be fun.)

My instructor told a story of people who were surprised to find that the place they had decided to dance had a marble floor. Slippery. Hard. Equation for dead people. Must make all dancers wear helmets. But then he realized that everyone was a good dancer, meaning they never changed weight until their body was over the foot. And this means they don't slip. So remember this secret next time you're walking on ice.

This is one of the main problems he has with salsa--there are so many steps where you just brace yourself, or use your foot to push off instead to take a real step. It looks sloppy and even unsafe to him. But then he remembers this is often learned in bars by drunk people; they are not too worried about these details.

The other secret is to move your weight from the heel of your foot all the way to the toe of your foot before you put weight on the other foot. The opposite of this would be kind of clomp-clomping around, putting all your weight evenly across your whole foot at once instead of shifting it from back to front.

I'm used to paying attention to the foot that's landing--should it land heel first or toe first, should it pass close to the other foot on the way to the next step or go directly there, is it waiting until the leader takes a step so that it knows how far to go? Let's just say that when I start paying attention to the other foot instead, the result is not pretty!

Disclaimer: I may have misinterpreted what I heard; use your own best judgment. If you use these secrets and do not look awesome on the dance floor and/or do slip on the ice, please do not sue me.

Site of the Day: Trial by Water, fourth in a series of articles on the recovery and relief efforts in Biloxi, Mississippi, from The Daily Texan, a student newspaper. Read this only if you are in the mood to cry or if you are tired of feeling sorry for yourself and want to either put things into perspective or get survival strategies. These lines summarize the article: "Tien Bui, a 62-year-old widower, shuffles around his nearly vacated property, which used to house a nail salon, barber shop and CD store. . . . The hurricane and its aftermath were bad, he said, but they weren't the worst hardships he's experienced in his life. Those titles are reserved for either the time his back was broken by torturers in Vietnam or the time he had to watch as his wife was murdered right in front of him."
livingdeb: (Default)
Today at work, we had the following party:

Friday, let's celebrate Josh and Laura's birthdays, the end of the fall semester, the Degree Audit section moving to Main 1, recognize Ted's last day, and get an early start on the generically recognized holidays! Bring whatever food/dessert/snack item catches your fancy. If desired, we can route around a sign-up sheet so that everyone doesn't bring paper plates. Terry has agreed to provide an interpretive dance of the day's events as part of our festivity highlights.

Friday, December 16th
2:00 PM
Somewhere in our office area


No routing sheet was used, nor did Terry provide an interpretive dance. However, we did socialize for a full hour, which is not like us. It was fun. My favorite dish was a milk chocolate cake made from a mix, frosted with cream cheese frosting. I got to bring a slice home and it's in the fridge right now ready whenever I am. Yum!

**

This evening we had a dance workshop on hustle--not The Hustle from the song, but a couple dance you do to disco music. (I have not watched "Saturday Night Fever" since I first learned the hustle, so I don't know if that's what they were doing. And I'm in no big rush to ever see that movie again.) I'd learned some steps of this dance a couple of times from another instructor who was pretty good, but that was a long time ago. It's pretty tiring.

In class, at first it seemed like a completely different step partially because it was a little different and partially because he taught, as the first step, a step that I had never done.

By the end of class it felt like the same dance and it was much less tiring. This is one of those dances where you go toward and away from your partner. When you're together, you're leaning toward each other, leaning on each other's hands. When you're away from each other, many people lean away, pulling on each other's hands. Richard discourages this technique because of the risk of hands getting sweaty and thus slippery and then bye-bye partner, it was nice knowing you. Instead you can both keep leaning in, which works surprisingly well and is extremely safe. And there's the added bonus that for me, this makes the steps you take while far apart require virtually no effort. I'll admit that it's slightly less fun or dangerous, but then you can do much more ridiculous steps, so it comes out just as fun and more flashy for the same effort.
livingdeb: (Default)
Today my boss took some people out to lunch at Hoover's: me, our (sometime) programmer, and our previous programmer who is still around to give advice.

The two programmers did most of the talking. But it was interesting, though I don't remember much now. And the food was pretty good.

Back at the office, there were bagels, chocolates, and cookies. Mmmm.

Now I get to go to two hours of fun dance lessons:

Steps Richard Almost Never Gets to Teach
(because they are complex and involve multiple skills at once — they are both lots of fun, but don't expect these to be easy)

This workshop will be conducted in two parts: learning a step in Tango, and learning a step that works equally well in Cha cha and in Mambo.

In Tango we will be learning a step combination that works in both International and American Tango: a fallaway whisk, pivots, and a Spanish drag; if time allows, we'll do an ending with a ronde de jambe and fallaway slip pivot. I've never taught this combination at ABD, so it should be new to everybody.

In Cha cha and/or Mambo we'll be building the cross-over swivels with pull-back and freeze piece by piece, so we'll be doing the cross-over swivels first and then adding two slightly different versions of the pull-back and freeze. I did teach this in Cha cha a few years ago, so some might have done it; now they can do it in Mambo, too.


Ooh, doesn't it sound like I'm about to become impressive?

After dance class I get to make (or buy) something for one of tomorrow's celebrations, so now my entry is over.
livingdeb: (Default)
On the day after Thanksgiving I drove to my parents' house to celebrate with my mom. My dad is out of town until next month, my sister is busy packing for her move, and my brother is also out of pocket, so it was just the two of us.

We watched several movies my mother had recorded using one of those new-fangled technologies I know nothing about.

One was the American remake of "Shall We Dance." There are so many things I like about the original that I want to say I like the original better. (And of course it is uncool to like an American remake of a foreign movie better than the original.) But it had a better ending and a few other additions I liked. The main character was a lawyer who wrote wills, which I thought was interesting. And the detective had a crush on the wife, which I didn't like, but which let us get to know the wife better, which I liked. Also, since the characters were Americans, they talked more, which I like.

However, the original had some things that were missing from the re-make which I enjoyed. Like charm. Mainly I think I liked the message more. The message I got from the original is that ballroom dancing is addictive. It's an odd message, but lets them show how beginners could want to continue with it, even though they feel like idiots when they're first starting. The characters actually learn dancing in a realistic amount of time (though still more quickly than I did).

Of course in American movies, people only look like idiots when they are playing idiots, and everyone else always learns everything instantly. In the American movie, the message was that ballroom dancing is passionate, and if you are not going to dedicate yourself to learning everything and becoming passionate, then there's no point in dancing at all. I don't like that message, but they did have a great scene showing how much more fun dancing is if you add passion to it (or the look of it anyway). I think I might be too embarrassed to dance like they do in that scene.

I was wondering how they were going to deal with how ballroom dancing is taboo in Japan, but not in the US. They decided that if people find out you are ballroom dancing, then instead of thinking you are a slut like in Japan, they will think you are gay. I was surprised they thought of anything, and it was important to the movie, so I'm glad they tried. But it didn't work as well.

I also liked how in the original, one character has to be a very good dancer and yet also be creepy--can you imagine trying to figure out how to do that? And another guy has to be very enthusiastic and passionate but still look like a dork, which is also very well done. They didn't capture that in the re-make. (The dancing was actually similar, but they almost completely removed these references from the script.)

In the middle of the day we went to a neighbor's house for Thanksgiving dinner. I was told that I look just like my father. Which was fun. I'm fantasizing about telling my dad that he is no longer allowed to think he is ugly or he will be thinking that I am ugly (which he doesn't)! Heh!

Dinner was delicious, then we escaped back home where Mom finished baking bread and talked me into coming to the synagogue with her in case they had trouble making a minyan (quorum). They still didn't make it, which I've never seen before. It means there were certain parts of the service we were not allowed to do. So the six of us just talked about what we were thankful for, went through the meaning of the Torah (Bible) reading for that day, and did the blessings over the candles, wine, and bread. Someone there said I looked just like my mother.

I don't remember anyone ever saying I look just like either of my parents. I guess we all three now look old! And short (although my mom still has a quarter inch on me)! And myopic!

Then we came home and watched an old movie about misfits running a training mission on a de-commissioned, then re-commissioned submarine. That was fun.

Nanowrimo Update

Since I was driving alone, I brought a tape recorder so I could write by talking. And I brought only one CD, the same CD that's been in my car for a month, so I wouldn't like it too long. I did, though. And it's a long CD, with 73 minutes of music. And I listened to some songs over and over trying to figure out the words. So finally I decided to start "writing." But by then I was in the icky parts of the route, where it's easy to fall off the road you're trying to stay on. So I turned the music back on.

Word count: 0.
livingdeb: (Default)
A friend lent me the DVDs of all the "Firefly" episodes. We are whooshing through them and will probably be finished with them in time to be able to see "Serenity" in a theater this weekend. I like to reward people who make good movies by going in a theatre rather than waiting for the DVD (though it's hard to tell who to reward before seeing the movie).

This series is really making an impression. Yesterday Robin was looking at some computer part and said, "Now, how do you really work?" and I thought of the episode where they brought up some philosopher who would torture people to find out what they're really like.

I don't see how that would work exactly. Don't they just keep screaming? Much better: put them in a mildly uncomfortable situation and then you can see if they stay calm and stay polite. Yes, I see this every week in ballroom dance class. Most people are perfectly fine. I think the others just quit coming. I have to tell you that eight couples doing tango in the room we use for advanced lessons is just too many couples. Learning a new step with just two backwards steps for the man resulted in many, many collisions.

And speaking of character tests, near the end of class, the instructor wanted to separate out the better people to learn a complicated step while the others continued working on the collision step. The way he did this was to ask the people who felt very confident about their pivot steps to come over to his side of the room. Shockingly, about half the class went over there (I felt that only one person could actually pivot).

I neither practiced nor tried the new step. I suck at pivot turns. And I didn't want to squoosh that old huge step into just half the room. And I wanted to see what the advanced step looked like. Also, I was feeling very snarky and was critically observing the other people's pivots. One person did surprise me in being better than I expected.

I later decided that the instructor had probably wanted me and at least one other person who sat out to be on his side of the room, and he did actually tell someone who came over to go back and keep practicing the old step. I decided that rather than measuring skill, he had measured confidence.

Journal Entry of the Day: Barriers Are Your Enemy on I Will Teach You To Be Rich. "I've been thinking about why some people are so successful so quickly, while others seem to get stuck. I think I've got one big reason: The smartest people relentlessly remove barriers around them. And the others let barriers control them." Not funny, but a very thorough explanation of a useful perspective.

Profile

livingdeb: (Default)
livingdeb

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 05:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios