livingdeb: (Default)
Robin and I are taking an Informal Class in cartooning.

The first week, our instructor distinguished between "doodling," which is just going right into drawing the outline of what you're working on, and "construction," which is starting with general shapes and adding detail from there. For example, try drawing a duck. If you start by outlining the beak, then adding the head, then continuing from there, you might be a doodler. If you start by drawing a circle for the body and a circle for the head, you're a constructionist.

According to the instructor, most cartoonists (including him) are constructionists because doodling is too hard.

I've been a doodler but decided I should try constructionist techniques since I can't actually draw and would like to be able to.

The best thing he did was give us some hints on how to draw faces at three different angles. The eyes start much lower than I've been thinking--about halfway down the face. The nose, half way down from there, and the mouth halfway down from there.

Our homework was to draw more faces.

In the past, I have doodled faces and they have come out looking like monsters.

I pulled out some photos and tried a few. I used more construction techniques and went for a more cartoony, simple approach than I've tried before. Most of the faces still looked like monsters, but one came out kind of cute except for the "funny goatee" (which was supposed to be a shadow). And one came out looking kind of like Beau Bridges (though I was trying to draw a baby).



The best part is that I figured out a way I like to draw eyes.
livingdeb: (Default)
Today I finished knitting my third rectangle for the blanket some folks at my office are making:

Three knitted rectangles

As you can see, they are all exactly the same size as that piece of cardboard.

Just because I'm done knitting doesn't mean I'm done. I still need to weave those yarn tails into the knitting and I need to block the pieces (that's knitting terminology for making them do my bidding). We'll see how well that works out. I've never blocked anything before.

The two pieces on the right look the same on the front and back and naturally lie pretty flat. The one with the squares is actually pretty easy to do without having to pay much attention. The other one is a lot like the one with the squares, only each square is divided into two triangles. This resulted in a 3-D texture or fluffiness I didn't expect and think I like. It requires a bit more concentration.

The one on the left is a chevron pattern and naturally lies curly. It doesn't look as good on the back. It requires me to think thoughts such as "purl, one, two, three" and "knit, purl, knit, one, two, three, four, five," which I find repetitive and boring. It is hard to think these thoughts while watching movies. Thus, not only did I make plenty of mistakes, but I made so many that some of them survived to the finished product. Oh, well. It's still kind of cool, especially from far away.
livingdeb: (Default)
Today I took some of the many beads I've been collecting from various gem shows to which I have been dragged and made a necklace to go with my little black dress:

necklace for little black dress

I haven't made many necklaces. I learned a few things from this experience.

First, I like to have different sizes of beads available. Note to self: do not get nothing but four-millimeter beads in the future.

Second, black beads are not that easy to string. It's not so easy to find the hole.

I've heard, though not experienced, that it's hard to knit with dark colors as well. So there's probably a general rule that it's hard to do fine work with black materials.

The only way I can see the hole in a black bead is if I have a view right through the whole bead to whatever's on the other side (ideally something that's not black). The two-millimeter black beads I used for this project are especially difficult to deal with. They are about the size of seed beads, only more spherical.

I developed the following strategy for finding the hole in the bead:
* Plan A - carefully take the bead off the string it's being stored on so that I know right where the hole is afterwards
* Plan B - drop the bead on a plate and let it roll around until it stops; at that point it is quite likely that there is a hole at the very top of the bead
* Plan C - pick up the bead and poke at it at random spots with the beading wire until the wire goes in
* Plan D - roll the bead around in my fingers looking longingly for a tiny tunnel of light

And now I'm done. Shiny!
livingdeb: (Default)
Today I saw a poster for Swap-O-Rama. Part of it is this: You bring clothes you don't want and can take home other people's clothes they don't want. Another part is that you can go to workshops on refashioning--how to take clothes that don't work for you and turn them into clothes that do. There is a fashion show where people show off re-fashioned items. And there's more. This sounds very interesting and I want to go. And some of you guys do, too. Empirical Question? Raaga123?

Searching for more information online, I found Swap-O-Rama which has more details and shows that there will be one in Austin October 21-22 at the Travis County Fairgrounds (which I've never heard of before, but which is apparently pretty close to my house and on one of the bus routes I often use).

Searching more, I found that this is part of Maker Faire, "a newfangled fair that brings together science, art, craft and engineering plus music in a fun, energized, and exciting public forum. The aim is to inspire people of all ages to roll up their sleeves and become makers." This actually looks intimidating and overwhelming to me, and thus less fun than I had originally thought. Isn't that weird? But now even more of you want to go. Chikuru? Grieve?

That page has a random picture on it, and the first one I saw was of a project I've seen before: the, um, tube with holes along one side out of which come flames that dance to music. So that gives you an idea of the range of what is going on. Here's a list of makers they have so far.

The bad news is that Maker Faire costs $20 to $25 to get in, per day, unless you volunteer for at least eight hours or have something you can demonstrate, in which case there is barely still time to send in an entry. Also, you can't bring food in, so it will cost you even more (or you'll have to run back to your car whenever you want to eat.

I think I'm going to blow some big bucks and check it out.

Profile

livingdeb: (Default)
livingdeb

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 02:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios