livingdeb: (cartoon)
I've heard that some people don't do well in retirement because they don't have the structure of a work day to inspire them to get things done. I always figured I could make my own structure if necessary.

I've already figured out that yes, this will be necessary for me, at least in regards to jogging. During my job (which generally involved working Monday through Thursday) I jogged on Friday and Sunday mornings.

As a retiree, I decided I could jog three times a week. I jogged Saturday (because I had worked the Friday of my last week) and by Tuesday night I still had not jogged again.

So I've decided I assign myself specific days to do my jogging. But which days? I've decided on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. These seem the least likely to conflict with other plans. And today is Wednesday and I have now jogged.

I'm sure I will add additional structures, even though I will also happily blow them off for the slightest good reason, because I can.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
Although I wasn't into committing to serious resolutions last year, I did accomplish a few things besides getting a job and donating blood, mostly in the physical and intellectual categories.

Physical

I started jogging again and can now jog three miles without stopping. Depending how you define "jog." Maybe it's more of a slog. But it's still aerobic, so it counts. I wasn't going to worry about this until after I retired, but changed my mind due to my brother-in-law's "Middle Kingdom March to War" challenge. I've already earned a coin!

I lost about half the weight I wanted to. In the past, I could lose excess weight by eating only my own cooking, but Robin likes to take me out to eat, so I'm not doing that diet. Instead, I have found two other things that work. One is to weigh myself every day to get an idea of which foods make me weigh more the next day and which don't. And the other is portion control on the things that lead to weight gain. I'm much better with moderation than quitting. (Exercise doesn't matter, nor does getting enough sleep, or drinking enough water; of course those things are all still good ideas for other reasons.) I now look exactly the same except one size smaller.

I finally got a colonoscopy, over 1.5 years late, but it worked out fine.

Intellectual

I read more books than usual this year. I real twelve nonfiction books plus parts of many American history books I learned about at my job. I've already written about Desert Solitaire, some books on aging, and an organizing book.

I also read fifty-one fiction books. That includes a lot of books by the same authors: Anne McCaffrey's Pern books, Craig Johnson's Longmire books, Georgette Heyer's Regency romances, Louis L'amour's westerns, and Edgar Rice Burrough's Tarzan and John Carter of Mars books. I also finally read Divergent and found another book in the Mysterious Benedict Society Series (The Extraordinary Education of Nicholas Benedict, which I liked so much I'm going to buy it). Plus I read a couple of books from other countries and a couple of other books recommended by various people.

I watched twenty-nine movies, fewer than usual, though still plenty. My favorites were "Her," "Captain America 2: The Winter Soldier," and "Big Hero 6." I also quite enjoyed parts of "The Grand Budapest Hotel," "Chef," "How to Train Your Dragon 2," "Snowpiercer," "Guardians of the Galaxy," "The King's Speech," "The Judge," "Juan of the Dead," and "John Wick."

And I saw two live performances: a singer-songwriter showcase including someone I know and a performance of "Much Ado About Nothing" (because I can never see too many versions of that play).

I didn't do any super exciting vacations, but I did do three mini-vacations to semi-local places we'd never been: Waco, Denton, and Lockhart plus a last-minute trip to New Orleans over the holidays.

And I started taking Spanish. This was another thing I was going to wait on until after I retired, but I heard two of our friends were taking Spanish I, so we joined them.

Creative

Not much on the creative front, but I did accomplish a few cool thing things: I found a feather scarf knitting pattern that's both easy and beautiful and knit a scarf. I discovered chocolate banana bread. A friend of mine taught a bunch of us to make a tree of life pendant. And I tried my new castle-shaped pan.

Social

My social achievements were also pretty minimal but I did get to attend quite a few parties and craft nights as well as Board Game Bash. And we got to visit a friend who'd moved to Denton from Denver.

Spiritual

I never do much in this category. I did donate some blood and sign so many petitions that I now fear my checking my non-friend e-mail address. I also made a few charitable donations, though I held off on most of those until after January 1 for tax purposes.

Domestic

I decluttered a few areas and helped Robin re-paint the bathroom after we got an exhaust fan installed.

Career

Besides getting a job and failing to work for a tax service, I also applied for retirement and made all the decisions required for that paperwork.

Financial

I did the usual--recalculating my budget as my income changed, contributing to retirement accounts and rebalancing those accounts, and taking Defensive Driving. I also thought through some different tax strategies for my bizarrely low-income year this year--more on that later.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
First of all, in 2013 I resolved to heal my shoulder and heel. I wasn't 100% certain that I had done so by the end of 2013, but now I am. Yea!

Last year

Last year I had one minor resolution: to donate blood more. I did. Robin and I went in every two months for a while until I started getting rejected for low iron and he had some kind of problem, too, which I no longer remember, and then we both had colds, and then we forgot. I would have thought that after menopause struck, I would have plenty of iron like men, but I guess not. Interesting. Overall, I'll call it a victory, though I could have done a little better.

I also was focused on work but decided that no work resolution was needed because I already had a strategy in place: to take only jobs where they want me. Specifically, I was going to start off working in the tax office half time and stay open to more degree audit jobs. Then after the tax season ended, I'd contact UT about doing temp jobs. And if any of these things stopped being fun at all, I'd leave.

What actually happened is that technical difficulties led to my not working at the tax office after all. At the same time, one of my colleagues suggested that I apply for another UT job. I did so and was hired. So I never applied for temp work. And it was financially okay that no one needed me for degree audit work. My job never got very fun, but I committed to holding out until I was qualified for my pension. So that worked out fine.

Next year

People like to ask me what I will do with myself after I retire. For now, most of the answer is going to be more of the same: more reading, more learning, more creating, more socializing, more exercise, more cooking, more cleaning, more fun.

I also specifically want to start learning Spanish again--which I already have--and to start volunteering to tutor some junior high school student in math. I know with volunteering, things can get out of control where once you say yes to one thing, you start getting pressured to give up all your time to volunteering. So I think I'm going to follow some advice I heard about winning the lottery: don't make any big decisions for at least a year.

I also thought of a very specific resolution-like thing I want to do which is to declutter at least one space per week all year. That sounds like a lot, but it's not because the spaces can be very small, like one drawer.

This week's project is my travel shower supplies. I used to fit everything into a Tupperware. Then rules changed and I needed smaller containers and they were supposed to be in a clear plastic baggy that I could pull out and display like Vanna White. I re-thought a few things, and after this trip, I have re-thought a few things again.

I now have a baggy that contains:
* Dr. Bronner's soap - good for soap, shampoo, and laundry
* vinegar water - this is what I use for hair conditioner these days
* face lotion that also has sunscreen - I can use this on other skin in the summer
* toothpaste

All of that can fit in my old Tupperware (between trips) along with:
* shower scrubby
* razor
* toothbrush
* dental floss

Nice and minimalist.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I finally remembered to go to the community college and check out the tutoring yesterday. Robin came with. Many sources agree that tutoring is the best way to learn a language short of full immersion.

I didn't really know what to expect, although I've actually been a math tutor before (statistics). Generally what would happen in math is that the students would bring some homework they were having trouble with and I would re-teach them the parts they didn't understand and then they would try to finish the problems from where they had gone wrong. We don't exactly have problems to work out in Spanish class.

So I asked the tutor what generally happens. And she said you bring something you're having trouble with. So neither one of us was properly prepared.

So we started by asking her to explain "gustar," the weird backwards-seeming word. It doesn't actually mean "to like" but to "please" and so you actually have to say that dancing pleases you rather than that you like dancing. But it feels like you are saying "Me likey dancing." And "Me likeys cookies." Because the verb agrees with the thing(s) you like, not with you.

Then I realized I wanted her to ask us questions using the new verbs we're learning, so we did that for a while. And that's when I realized a few more phrases that are a lot quicker to say in Spanish than in English which is way fun. The most handy one for us is "¿Qué buscas?" (pronounced KAY BOOSS-kahss). That means "What are you looking for?" Two words instead of five! Three syllables instead of six!

Other good ones:
* ¿Qué miras - What are you looking at?
* ¿Qué esperas? - What are you waiting for? (The bus.) Or What are you hoping for? (I'm hoping a bus will come someday.)
* ¿Qué escuchas? - What are you listening to?

And this short form is possible because you can tell the subject pronoun from the verb and because those particular verbs include the prepositions (for/at/to) that we have to add in English.

Belonging

Sep. 14th, 2014 09:41 pm
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I got to go to an and-of-summer party yesterday. This is a swimming pool and board game party thrown by some friends who have millions of friends. It's generally quite large and full of people I don't know, though after all these years of party attendance I am actually getting to recognize some of them.

One interesting thing I noticed is the huge difference I feel between work and this party in terms of being in the loop.

At work I feel very out of the loop. For example, I was not automatically "invited" to certain committee meetings and didn't notice until Wednesday that two of them were on Friday, so I took Thursday off instead of Friday. If I had gotten the notifications when the meetings were set up for all the principal attendees, I would have noticed earlier and probably taken off Wednesday instead of Thursday.

For another example, a couple of weeks ago I contacted the head of the advisors in my college and asked if they had meetings of any kind and, if so, whether it would be appropriate for me to attend these. He said yes, they have monthly meetings, and I am welcome. But my predecessor didn't come because she was only part-time. I am also part-time, but feel that advisor meetings should not include all advisors except me.

(Another sad thing is that I'm a little afraid to tell my supervisor that I contacted the head advisor and am doing this. Because I'm a little afraid that she'll tell me that I don't need to go to those. I want to at least see what one is like before I let the cat out of the bag. And this is even though I know my supervisor likes me to keep her up to date on all my goings on.)

In contrast, at the party I got to find out things! I wasn't necessarily told directly, but it still felt good. For example, one friend who likes to help host Halloween parties told the hostess that she would not be doing so this year because her husband will be out of town. So, the hostess might like to throw the party instead. However, the hostess likes to go to the party thrown by the No Kidders (group for people who don't want kids). (Yes, most years she goes to at least two Halloween parties!) And I get to know way ahead of time instead of just wondering at the end of October if anyone I knew would be having a party.

For another example, when I went down to the hot tub to say goodbye to the host, the gal he was talking to recognized me as someone who performs at recitals and requested another recital. And so I got to hear the preliminary plans being formulated (perhaps next April).

The party was a lovely antidote to the alienation of work, even though I see even my favorites of those people much less often than I do my co-workers.

Also, of course it was a nice party where I got to learn about how Starbucks barista jobs are stressful (but why? that is so wrong!), two friends are probably moving into new jobs soon (one is having the job created for her; one has two companies talking to her but the timing is off and she might lose both opportunities), one of my classmates is angry about how much time our teacher wastes, one of my friends is willing to travel only 33% for her job now and yet is currently travelling over 50% and, for example, has the highest status on an airline that flies only to one country (The Philippines), etc.

And I tasted bread pudding made with biscuits, which also seemed to have custard and chocolate--too bad I was so full by the time I tasted that. And I learned that chicken nuggets make a good party food. And there are these "chips" made out of cookies you can buy now. And I got to wear a winter hat in Austin in September because it went with the party theme and it was actually a bit cool outside.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
Someone was telling me he was having a hard time deciding on when to roll over his 401K into a Roth IRA. He's at a crossroads in his life and really has no idea what his income will be like next year. It could be much, much lower than this year (thus, the perfect time to roll over the funds and pay very little in taxes) or much, much higher (putting him in a high tax bracket).

I recommended doing what he'd do if he knew he'd be poor next year: wait until next year to rollover the account. If he's wrong, he'll be rich enough to afford the cost of that mistake.

There are probably a lot of other bad financial decisions that are easier to recover from if you've assumed too much future poverty rather than too much future wealth.

**

In other news, it went from being horribly hot to uncomfortably chilly (if you're wearing shorts or hanging out in the pool) in ONE DAY. Directly from hellfires to autumn with no good summer in between. Fortunately, I think we've got some good summer days in the future.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
There are so many things that are bad for you long term but in the short term there is no noticeable effect. So, since you can't see an effect, if you're not just going to bury your head in the sand, then you have to figure out who to trust.

And this is (mostly) not one of those things where turning to religion helps. One exception: I once read that the iron in meat cancels out the good effects of the calcium in dairy and vice versa, so the Old Testament rule about not eating meat and milk together helps you with that one. There are probably some more, but probably not a lot.

Mostly I'm inclined to trust science. However, there are [at least] three big problems with trusting science:

1) Long-term effects take a long time to discover. Long-term science is expensive and rare.

2) Correlation is not causation but it is so damned tempting. For example, death by heart attack is hard to measure--you have to wait around and see how people die. But death by heart attack is correlated with high cholesterol, which is super easy to measure. So you have millions of studies about cholesterol, but what do they really tell us about heart attack death risks?

3) Scientists can no longer be trusted. There is pressure to publish, and people only want to publish "good" results, not boring results. (There is less pressure to publish "true" results.) So people will lie about their results. Plus, a lot of research money comes from biased parties. Plus, even if the science is good, science reporters are often unbelievably incompetent or just plain lying bastards.

And those three problems are making me angry. I am willing to make small and even medium changes in my behavior to better my health. But I don't want to change things I like for no reason at all. Or to change, be wrong, and have to change back (I'm talking about you, margarine, which it turns out people knew was bad for you when it was first invented, but I didn't get the memo).

Also, with the internet, it's so easy to find information. I should be able to find out anything I want! But if the information is all suspect, then it's just frustrating.

Here are just a few of the questions I am wondering about now.

* How bad is it to store your food in plastic really? What about "food-grade" plastic? How bad is it to microwave your food in plastic? What about "microwave-safe" plastic? I love bringing plastic containers to restaurants--they are lightweight, they are durable, and they nest. But I could switch to glass, which is inert.

* How bad is sugar for me really? Is it okay if I just keep my weight down and brush and floss well and am not (yet) diabetic? Or am I really just asking for trouble? (Diabetes runs in my family. When we were kids we theorized that it might be case that you only get a certain amount of sugar in your life, and if you eat it too quickly you turn diabetic earlier than if you just spread out your intake. However, it looks like some people--at least two that I know--have been able to turn back their diabetes by reducing their weight. And then they get to eat sugar again.) Does letting my blood sugar spike and plummet (even if I don't notice symptoms) wreak havoc with my body?

* How bad is jogging for you really? Does it depend on if you're doing it wrong? If so, am I doing it wrong? Or if you're built wrong (and am I built wrong?)? Do I really have to buy new shoes every five minutes (or whatever the ridiculous time frame du jour is)? If my feet and knees and hips aren't hurting, does that mean I'm okay? Is it okay if I don't do it too much, like training for marathons all the time? Or is all jogging so high impact that it contributes to a ticking bomb of bodily destruction? Or is that impact just what I need to protect me from the osteoporosis for which I have multiple risk factors?

* Okay, uncle, I should have been wearing sunscreen through my entire childhood--or wait, sunscreens in those days were probably poisonous themselves, so I should have been wearing hats and long sleeves. While swimming. My dad always made sure that wherever we moved, we lived near a pool, but I should have ignored that and stayed inside? The damage was irreversible. Like asbestos and fiberglass and maybe lead. Well, I'll just wear sunscreen now and watch for signs of skin cancer.

Yes, yes, first-world questions. And yes, I am very appreciative that I rarely have to worry about quick-acting poisons.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
An old roommate of mine who knew several languages and also taught language courses said that flashcards are key for building your vocabulary. So I decided to do some googling and see what I'd find.

I've been reading that it's a good idea to put different kinds of things in different colors and locations to help you remember. The example given is usually gender. Spanish has two genders. If you put nouns of one gender in one color and on, say, the left side of the card and the other in another color on the other side of the card, then it's easier to remember the gender. (I've also heard to always put "the" in front: "el" in front of masculine words and "la" in front of feminine words to help you remember.)

There are also three kinds of verbs that could be recorded in three colors.

And some adjectives have masculine and feminine versions while some are the same for both.

So, now I have an excellent excuse to get colored writing implements! It's important! For my brain!

**

I also learned (from reading reviews on Amazon) that modern index cards are not as thick as index cards from my youth. This is apparently true of both name brands and no-name brands.

It looks like buying card stock and making your own is not cheaper. I bet index cards are one of those things that are loss leaders sometimes at the end of summer. I'm thinking of cutting 3x5 index cards in half, though. Or fourths. We'll see.

And cutting up cards is way more fun with a paper cutter. I might be able to borrow one I know about in the next building at work; it's one of the scary guillotine-style ones from my youth. I've seen cute little ones with some kind of slider cutters in craft stores that look like they might cut only one card at a time with a much less satisfying cutting sound, but also with a risk of losing only part of your finger at most rather than, well, anything and also taking up a lot less space.

Of course the frugal method involves scissors (or, heh, folding and tearing), but it's harder to get them the same size that way.

I must get my own guillotine paper cutter! For my brain! (Wait, that sounds wrong.)

**

There are also flashcard apps, but they don't have colors. Anki is highly reviewed, but free only for big computers, not portable ones, and it also has a high learning curve. What's good is that it gives you the harder cards more often and vice versa.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
Before having kids, there were three things my mom decided she wanted from her kids. One was that she didn't want us to be racist. The three of us are quite different from each other, but none of us grew up racist. She was so happy when my brother pointed out the boy whose mom insisted she meet us before he could come over, and he described the only black guy on the playground as the boy with the red shirt.

Another goal is she didn't want us to be the kind of kids who scream for things at the check-out counter at grocery stores. The kind who is so obnoxious that you give them the thing just to shut them up. If we had done this, she would have just left the store immediately without buying anything. I do recall that my sister once said, "Mom, I need some smash." But that was in a basically normal tone of voice and was in the aisle with the squash, not at the check-out counter, and she didn't throw a fit when she didn't get it. So Mom succeeded in this goal as well.

I don't recall the third thing, but I do recall that she succeeded there as well, too.

Of course, she says, there were a number of other things she should have thought about ahead of time that didn't turn out as well!

So I've decided to start thinking about what worries me about getting older and to figure out some strategies for dealing with those things.

Losing abilities

The biggest worry is that I will no longer be able to do some of the things I can do now. I recall mourning the loss of my ability to do flips (ugly ones, but flips nonetheless) in my twenties because I became too chicken. That ability is not even important or even very useful. What will I be like when I lose useful abilities? I don't want to become bitter and no fun if I actually still can do plenty of other things.

One obvious solution is to keep practicing the important things so that I don't lose those skills. Keep learning things and otherwise using my brain. Exercise. Reach for things on high shelves. Get up off the floor. That's great as far as it goes, but things do start breaking down as you age anyway. So another strategy is to keep fixing them (with medicine, physical therapy, surgery). And another strategy is to use helpful aids, even if they make me look old (cane, walker, wheelchair--and I'm already wearing glasses). Also, learn sign language.

Another idea is to look at what's most likely to break down and do the things I most want to do that require those abilities sooner rather than later. Are there places I want to hike? Books I want to read? Things I want to make? I think I'm pretty good at keeping up with things like this, actually.

But what if I become so decrepit I can't even drive? People who can't drive probably don't want to deal with buses either and might have trouble riding bikes. How do you get places? There may be some kind of bus for handicapped people. And I guess taxicabs. So you need money. I also read about someone who thinks New York City is perfect for old people because you can have anything delivered there. That's a rather pricy solution as well.

But what if I become too stupid and gullible to deal with my own finances? Yikes. I sure don't want anyone else dealing with them. Fortunately these days it's easier to automate things.

Looking old

If I live long enough, there will come the day when I look like just another old person instead of like myself. Yes, yes sunscreen. I'm not dying my hair, though (smelly, messy, expensive, possible stings). (Well, maybe I'll henna it once--red is so pretty.)

I may get into hats and/or scarves.

Getting boring

I don't want to be one of those people who just talks about my never-ending medical problems (and I am totally a person who talks about my medical problems--they are a part of me!). Or I knew one couple that talked only about restaurants and routes to places.

I think if I can just keep my mouth shut about boring things (and things I've already said to the people I'm talking with), I will always be trying to do other things as well that are of some interest to some people.

Running out of friends

There came a point in my Grandma Miller's life when she had outlived all her friends. Yes, she could make more friends, but there is a big difference between new friends and friends of sixty-plus years.

This is a real danger to me, too. Currently, I mostly hang around people my age, people ten years older, and people ten years younger. Well, I will be auditing classes and tutoring kids, so maybe all is not lost.

Running out of money

This could certainly happen. But the house is paid off. I will have a state pension big enough to cover all my basic expenses plus some extras--that's for life, but it might not keep up with inflation or might even be reduced at some point. (Similarly, Social Security.) I have a Roth IRA made of index funds--even though I've been maxing it out since it was invented, that turns out not to add up to much, but since I won't need it until my needs increase, it can grow (and plummet) as a safety net. I have a few I-bonds, dividend growth stocks, and speculative stocks as well.

I sometimes think my city might become too horrible (corrupt, hot, expensive) for me to want to live here anymore (or all my friends will get jobs with Google and move to California), but most other places I would like would cost more.

And I'm too poor to have long-term-care insurance. I may also have to figure out how marriage and joint financial accounts affect finances when one person gets sick enough to need all the money or their business goes down the tubes or something.

But mostly, I'm not too worried about this area. Admittedly because there's nothing more I'm willing to do in this area (besides learn new frugality skills).

Fixing up the house

I should maybe think about making my house more accessible while it's still fairly easy. Certainly keep working on getting rid of the clutter! (I've heard that you can get tax breaks for doing things like adding grab bars to your bathtub area--but not until you already need them, by which time you probably can't do it yourself anymore. Doh!)
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I was going to start Spanish classes in summer, after doing as poorly as possible without lying on any Spanish placement test. Those plans have changed.

First of all, the local community college is much more worried about people starting at too high of a level than about people ruining the curve for true beginners, so they don't require a placement test.

But much more importantly, I found out at Chikuru's and Raaga123's end-of-summer party that Fraeuleinchen was going to take Spanish I this fall with P, someone we know from ballroom dancing, two weekday nights from 6:30 until 8:50 at a convenient location that actually has parking and isn't scary at night. Robin had the idea that we could join them (no, I don't know why I did not also have this idea until it was handed to me). Fraeuleinchen and P also liked this idea, and we have now all registered and gotten into the class. Woo hoo!

Automatic study group! Of course, we all know that study groups made out of your friends don't always work well and could possibly even ruin the friendships (or, at least, that's what I've heard about roommates), but I'm not too worried about this happening. I actually think everyone will be a good study group person unless they just don't have time in which case they will just be nonexistent.

I've decided it will be best if I take the bus directly there from work instead of hoping I get home before 6:00 like I often don't and then dealing with rush-hour traffic. Unfortunately, this will mean I need to bring lunch and dinner to work with me. That's easy enough in itself. The question is, how can I keep myself from gobbling down all my food before lunch starts, like I sometimes do? (Like I often do.) My best plan is to bring peanut butter and pumpkin butter sandwiches for dinner. I like them and they are semi healthy (protein, fiber, vitamin A), but I don't crave them. Especially at work, I generally want something hot and savory. So that might work. And if I bring two, and cut them in half, then even if I do eat some early, the serving size of 1/2 sandwich may slow me down enough so that I'm not hungry during class.

Another question is how to find enough time to study. It looks like 1 hour per day on other weekdays and 2 hours per day on the weekends would officially be enough--that seems possible. But nothing else will be happening on those class days but work and class.

I'm not sure what text we're using yet--if they go the same route as recent years, it will be one of those text + online-stuff-requiring-an-expiring-one-person-only-code things. That's fine for me; the money's coming out of my long-term fun fund (normally used for vacations and electronics).

I've looked up resources at the college. They have some sort of study lab with rooms you can reserve for study groups and with free tutoring (even in Spanish) as well as free online tutoring. Wow.

In the past, I've felt that anyone who "needs" tutoring is a failure, but being a tutor made me realize that (at least for statistics), tutoring can make the learning more efficient. I'm not sure how that works with language learning--I'm generally good at understanding concepts and terrible at memorizing vocabulary. We'll see.

I also thought it might be good to find a recommended text to have an extra source of info. Instead, online research led me to the Practice Makes Perfect series, so I've gotten Spanish Verbs and Spanish Nouns/Adjectives (used).

I've also tried to find the awesome flashcard ap I'd read about a while ago (I think it's Anki) which shows you the harder cards much more often than the easier cards, but still shows you the easier cards occasionally so you don't forget them. It uses science! My favorite! I haven't tried downloading it, seeing if it works for my iToy (portable) and computer (easy to type into) and sincs well between them and if I can get past the learning curve.

Finally, I do want to look for immersion opportunities--telenovelas, children's books, movies, etc. Then you can learn some things almost magically, where you know something's right because it sounds right even if you don't know why.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I met the challenge (50K steps per week for 6 weeks). I also met most of my daily challenges (10K steps per work day, 5K steps per weekend day). My plan worked!

So now I am switching my focus to the year-long "Middle Kingdom March to War" for which the goal is to travel some multiple of 400 miles outside of your daily activities by walking, running, biking (divided by four), and swimming. Each 400 miles represents the journey of one soldier to the battleground.

I'm noticing interesting differences between these two challenges. For example, because the travel has to be beyond your daily goals, then catching one of the less convenient buses home (which requires an extra mile of walking at the end) doesn't help like it does with the pedometer challenge. Similarly, if I don't bring my lunch and walk to lunch, that walking doesn't count the way walking at lunchtime counts if I brought my lunch. Jogging to the bus stop doesn't count if I'm afraid I'll miss my bus. But if not, especially if I'm sleepy and would rather be walking, then it does. (Well, that's my interpretation.)

Also, doing my pilates video or the 7-minute workout don't count the way they did for my other challenge where I was allowed to convert those to step equivalents.

So, I've been doing a little extra walking in the evening, even if I didn't need it for my step count, just to have some more to count toward the Marching challenge. And as of last night, I've decided to bring weights and work on my arms during those night walks. At first they will be tiny. Eventually I will graduate up to small. We wouldn't want to go overboard now.

I've calculated that for the Marching challenge, I need to travel an average of 1.1 miles per day per soldier. Or, if I can do double on work days, 1.4 miles per work day and 0.7 miles per weekend day. I've decided that although providing a single soldier would not be automatic, it would be an easy goal. Providing two would take more work, but is also certainly within reason. Providing three may be reasonable if I get more into jogging after I retire next year.

So I'm planning to continue doing both challenges. I will try for a minimum of 5K or 10K total steps each day (depending whether it's a work day). But I will also try for an average of at least 1.4 or 2.8 extra miles each day (also depending). Currently I am on track to supply 1.35 soldiers after the year is up. Our group as a whole has already supplied its first soldier, so we now officially have an army. A tiny, pathetic army. But that soldier will inspire others to join.

But, I will be taking a Spanish class next fall (details coming), and I think that might end up taking a crazy huge amount of time. Spanish will be prioritized over exercise, so we'll see what happens.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I am getting a pan in the shape of a castle for my birthday this year, by which I mean I already got it even though it's not officially my birthday (observed) yet.

It looks so cool!

Unfortunately, I am afraid to use it. I once had a waffle iron. After using it, I had real trouble getting it clean. I scrubbed. I let it soak and scrubbed again. Many, many times. Then I was afraid to use it again, even though I learned that you're supposed to coat it with butter or oil first even though it's teflon, so I just gave it away.

Just look at all those nooks and crannies. That is not going to be fun to clean.

The instructions say to "brush" the entire inside "with solid vegetable shortening and dust with flour or cocoa" before adding the batter or dough. Even though the interior is supposedly nonstick.

Robin wants to make aspic in it. I'm not afraid of that being hard to clean out--I just don't want to eat it.

Monkey bread, where each piece is dipped in butter, doesn't sound that scary either, except for the fact that it's yeast bread and that's not really what I want to make.

So, I'm doing some additional research.

Georgia Pellegrini, using a similar pan, has these hints:
* She oils and flours the pan.
* She says to "give the mold a few taps against the counter to get out any air bubbles."
* Also to "take a spatula and pull the batter up on the sides so that it is a bit higher than the center ... since the center rises faster than the edges."
* She dusts the finished cake with powdered sugar, which emphasizes the shape nicely.

The following tips come from Grandma Bonnie's Closet:
1. Wash your pan thoroughly with warm soapy water and dry well.
2. Coat your pan with a baking spray. The baking spray should contain flour in it. Very Important! Use a pastry brush to evenly distribute the spray into every crevice. Make sure there are no globs of flour or pools of oil in the pan.
3. Fill the pan about 3/4. Roll the pan from side to side to coat the walls of the pan above the batter line. This helps the cake to rise up evenly on the sides.
4. Tap the pan on a table or counter to release any air bubbles.
5. Allow the cake to cool for 10 minutes after baking. No shorter or longer than 10 minutes.
6. Pick up the pan with hot pads. Gently shake the cake sided to side. Use a plastic spatula to release any cake sticking along the edges.
7. Invert the pan on a cooling rack or plate. Allow to finish cooling.

One reviewer on Amazon says this "bakes up just like any other bundt cake, so long as you get each nook and cranny of the pan interior with flour-added cooking spray. (It's right there on the grocer's shelf next to the regular spray.) If you do that one simple step, I guarantee that this cake will release from the pan perfectly every time!"

Another says, "Follow the directions for flouring and cooling. If you don't, you'll be using a toothpick to clean those details. Otherwise, the cakes lifts out perfectly. I use Bak-klene spray available at Williams-Sonoma, where I purchased the pan. Then I flour the pan."

Another says, "I tried using Bakers Joy and the cake still stuck. The next time I used Bakers Joy, added flour and baked the cake a bit longer and it came out perfectly. Don't be afraid to let your cake get well done in this pan- it helped rather than hindered."

Another says, "Just make sure to spray the thing really well with Pam before you bake. I use a baby bottle brush to speed clean up of the pan when I'm done."

Another says, "I spray the nooks and crannies heavily with cooking spray (any kind works fine, not just the flour version) and the cake comes right out." Hmm, opposing advice.

Another says, "I let the finished cake cool for about 10 minutes before flipping the pan over on a wire rack, then I let it cool the rest of the way in the pan (overnight, usually) and give it a slight shake to release. I've been told I should release it after the first 10 minutes, but then I'm afraid the cake will go stale or get wrecked if I try to cover it before it's completely cooled off. It seems to work fine for me to leave it in the pan until completely cooled.

"My only complaint is that I had a hard time locating some information about how much to fill it (2/3 to 3/4 seems to be the best)."

Some cleaning tips:

One reviewer says, "Cute idea If you are bored and have nothing to do ....and have an extra 45 minutes to clean a cake pan with a Q-tip to get every crevice clean then you should buy this cake pan. This is not dishwasher safe."

Here's a thorough one: "First cake did not come out easily. Learned to wait until just ready to pour into mold to spray with flour cooking spray. No problems with cake removal since. This bundt pan is a little hard to clean after use but well worth the extra few minutes. If you boil some water and pour it into the mold and add a squirt of a degreaser dishwashing soap, wait a few minutes, you should have no problem swishing with a wash cloth to get it clean."

Another says, "The pan is a pain in the butt to clean. I recommend a SOFT toothbrush."

This may or may not be smaller than a normal bundt cake pan, so I may have to use less batter.

I'm also realizing that transporting it may be problematic.

I'm not sure I feel better yet. I'll just have to work through my fears and experiment.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
It's another week of victory. By which I mean I logged over 10K steps each work day and over 5K steps each weekend day.

I continued pacing at the bus stop and walking during lunch like before the challenge. I did my pilates workout again and walked around the block a few times like last week. And I also did a twelve-minute workout* and an evening of ballroom dancing.

* The link goes to a 7-minute workout. I am not efficient at looking up the next exercise and remembering how to do it and getting to the place where I can do it so it took me 12 minutes. Also, I didn't do that exact workout, but a similar one I made up to have more upper-body stuff.

Last week it felt like a mild challenge; this week, an annoyance. One should not wait until bedtime to finish up, ideally.

My total steps (and step equivalents) are now 129,265. Subtracting 58,571 from last week means this week's total was 70,694. That extra 20K was almost entirely from the dancing.

It turns out that the official work challenge is really completing 300,000 steps in six weeks. I still prefer my version of meeting daily goals. Unless I'm really aching or something from overachieving the day before, I should be getting up out of my chair several times a day to do something more active.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
So, I am taking up my employer's challenge to walk 50,000 steps per week for six weeks. Though today I learned that we get to blow a week and still consider ourselves a success.

My baseline number of steps on work days (doing just the minimum of what I normally do) is about 6,000. If I also pace at the bus stop, like I learned to do when I first got my pedometer many years ago, that adds a couple/five hundred more. Walking during lunch adds two to three thousand more. And taking one of the two buses that drops me off on Duval instead of Cameron adds another three thousand. I found a bus stop for the trip home with three acceptable bus routes, so I just get on whichever of these buses comes first because I hate waiting for buses, hoping longingly that I will get to go home some day.

My baseline number of steps on weekend days is about 500. Because my hobbies mainly involve sitting.

So, since I work only 4 days per week, this really is a challenge, even if I don't ever get the good bus.

My strategy is to try for 10K steps each work day and 5K steps each weekend day for a total of 55K steps. This is a good compromise between a reasonable amount of steps for human health (supposedly 10K - 15K per day) and the amount I actually do.

One week has gone by and so far I have made all my goals, so that's been a nice surprise.

Work day strategies: pace at the bus stop and walk during lunch of course. (And I haven't been walking during lunch for the past couple of weeks previously, so that's still a good thing.) Then, if I catch the good bus, I walk around the block* a few times after I get home. Just every hour or two, I'll leave the house and walk around the block once, which is just over 500 steps. So I've actually been catching the good bus and thus barely achieving my goal most days; the day with the bad bus I walked 11,217 steps.

*Not my block. Like people who live on cul-de-sacs, walking around my block is complicated. For example, it is bounded by ten roads. But the block across the street is a tiny block bounded by four roads as expected. (I think Chikuru, Raaga123, and maybe Indigo Rose have a similar situation.) I've often told myself I should get up off my butt and walk around the block periodically, but I haven't actually done it until this week. (And I'm still not doing it once I've met my goal.)

Weekend days are rougher. One day I made an excuse to walk somewhere (to see if Old Navy has any of those nice t-shirts like I have--but no, those tissue-weight t-shirts are still in). One day I did my pilates video--the challenge folks have a converter where you select your activity, say what your heart rate was during the activity, and say how many minutes you were doing this activity, and it calculates a step equivalent. That turned out to be just over 3K steps. I already can't remember what I did the third day--I think I just paced a lot at home and walked around the block a few times.

So here is the summary:

Official challenge - 50K steps
My goals - 55K steps
My actual total - 58,571 steps

And what are the side effects? Anything good?

One side effect might be that I have more mosquito bites. Though it's spring, and I generally have more mosquito bites in spring anyway, so maybe not.

One is that I have a new blazer, because I stopped in at some other stores on the way home from Old Navy. Not sure if that's good or not yet.

I've noticed that all the other yards on the block are better than mine.

And if I have any neighbors who are looking out their windows a lot spying on everyone, then they are probably not having the best opinion of me. I mean, sometimes I walk in a wavy path instead of a straight path, like the girl in "True Stories," to get more steps, which might make me look a little crazy. At the very least, I might be a suspicious character, clearly checking out all those yards.

I think I have so far succeeded in not subconsciously deciding that since I am burning several extra calories each day, I can therefore eat several hundred extra calories to make up for that.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
One of my plans for things to do when I retire is to finally learn Spanish. I would do all the things I used to do when taking classes:
* go to class
* do the readings
* do the homework
* study for the tests
* be well-rested for the tests
* ask the instructor questions/visit during office hours (didn't really learn that until the very end)

Plus I would do what my old roommate Cissy recommended:
* flashcards for vocabulary learning (and I once found a flashcard ap that looked really good)

And what my old friend Mattias did:
* try to do a lot of my self-talking in Spanish

And what my friend James did:
* try to get a study partner

And my old friend Jack:
* figure out who the smartest and best students are and sit near them and try to do any group projects with them

Plus I would do those things I've been hearing about from by academic advisor co-workers:
* start a study group
* talk to an advisor and see what is recommended
* check out any learning center resources

And what I've heard from other sources about language learning:
* study every day, even if it's just a few minutes--cramming doesn't work
* talk to Spanish speakers, even though you don't sound as good as a two-year-old (maybe--scary--or maybe just try conversation meet-ups and/or an informal class on conversational Spanish, plus at restaurants)

And my own additional ideas:
* pick up children's books from the library
* look at the same topics in multiple texts, not just our required textbook
* become a tutor
* watch familiar movies with the sound and/or subtitles in Spanish

I suck at languages. So even though I had three years of Spanish in high school and have tried to learn it a few times since then, I thought I'd take Austin Community College's placement test cold. And make sure not to answer any of the questions unless I was sure of the answer so I wouldn't look more advanced than I really am. I'm afraid I'll get into a class where there will be a lot of prerequisite knowledge I don't have, and I have enough trouble keeping up as it is. I'd rather start in a class where I already know some of the stuff and then I can learn every single other thing that is taught. And then by the end of the classes I will actually know Spanish--be able to talk to people, read my favorite local Spanish weekly newspaper, and maybe even read Spanish books in the original (though there's nothing in particular I'm looking forward to).

But then I saw a review of duolinguo, which teaches you things bit by bit and you keep score like in a video game that's actually fun. And because the lessons are short and repetitive, you actually learn things and don't get overwhelmed and don't forget last week's stuff while you're learning this week's stuff.

So now I'm thinking maybe I'll learn and re-learn as much stuff as I can on my own and then take the placement test, hoping I'll need at least one more class because group learning is better.

Opinions?

Quote of the Day - "Of course I can't go interview people myself because I have a medical condition where I don't want to." - Stephen Colbert

Teamwork

Apr. 24th, 2014 07:03 pm
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I participated in real teamwork at work today!

The problem: In this one situation, audits don't show that your course is counting until you've taken all the required courses for that one requirement.

My first thought: Arg, my brain is going to hurt! I hate this crazy complex requirement!

My first semi-useful idea: Ask the Registrar's Office to fix the processing so that the audit shows the best option rather than the last option. Knowing that they will refuse again.

Her first idea: Simplify the rule so it doesn't have that problem, but instead has another problem which is much less frustrating for students and their advisors.

Post-meeting final idea: Simplify the rule so that it works perfectly. (Hope that none of the reasons it had to be complicated remain--we know some of the reasons and how they disappeared, but do we remember all of them?)

We tested with over 40 students. Their audits all worked perfectly. Woo hoo!

The paranoia: Surely we're missing something. This has happened so many times before. We find a problem, we figure out a tweak. Ad infinitum.

But maybe the problems are now all fixed! Maybe this is a perfect solution that we worked out together as a team, alternately proposing ideas, poking holes in them, being flabbergasted that we can't find holes, and then the magical whole-is-greater-than-the-sum-of-its-parts thing happens.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
Last weekend we went out of town to help one of Robin's friends celebrate his 50th birthday. One of the activities was a cross between whiffle ball and bumper cars. You steer with one hand while holding a spatula-like scoop with the other hand, and there are eight of you against eight of them with the goal of flinging a plastic ball at something resembling a basketball backboard.

The first game I'm not sure I touched the ball at all, but I did get better at controlling my vehicle and enjoyed driving it all over the court like a maniac. I was also happy to find out that when I totally slammed into something or vice versa, it was fun and not painful. One day I will be too old or brittle for that, but not yet.

The second game I did actually get a hold of the ball several times and I completed two passes. Fun times!

There weren't enough cars for everyone, so I sat out every other game, and during one of these times I noticed that people tended to err in the direction of the ball going over the target board rather than under.

The third time I got an opportunity to make a shot myself and indeed I did not make that common mistake--instead it went under the board. Dang.

I often got into the action and sometimes roamed around the other end hoping the ball would come flying my way (like I always used to do in soccer class so my shins wouldn't get kicked all the time).

I'm pretty sure I was one of the worst people there, but I still had fun.

Then we played laser tag. I'd never done this and I never did figure out all the rules. For the first third of the game, I enjoyed hiding and getting people as they ran through. At first I noticed I got shot in the back twice (from invisible people above), so I had to move. Then sometimes people would surprise me and sometimes I would surprise them. But then a huge crowd of the other team came through and it was no fun anymore so I moved to another area.

I ended up joining a large gang of my own team with one guy calling out locations of enemies such as "on the bridge!" This was kind of fun but I was definitely doing less. Then we dispersed again and for the last third of the game I was mostly running around and occasionally getting shot.

When the game ended, they announced the total score of the two teams, something like 19,000 for my team to 20,000; not embarrassing. When we got out, we got score cards. I was ranked 19 out of 19 (or was it 21 out of 21?). No worries, it was fun making a victory cheer about how I won last place. Then I noticed that my score was 350, and the next lowest score was well over 1000. So basically, I single-handedly lost the game for my team. Oops! That was a little embarrassing. But as with the last game, no one was serious, it was all just good fun.

Friday night we had a surprise visitor at craft night from someone who had moved several states away. She had just learned to make trees of life which are wire pendants consisting of a thick wire circle enclosing a gnarly tree shape made of thinner wire. She got lots of practice and got to where she could make one in only 20 minutes.

She brought a huge pile of them, each in a little linen bag she had stamped, and gave them to us. Then she told us we could trade the one we got if we liked another one better. I got one with "leaves" made of snowflake obsidian (a white and black stone, as you might have guessed). I didn't actually like any of the other ones better, so yea!

Then the real gift is she taught us how to make some ourselves. She had forgotten the stones to use for the leaves (they were packed, but not in the same place as all the other supplies), but she did have stones to use for full moons. Fun times.

Mine turned out to be the worst one. Sparce, boring, and the outer circle was no longer circular. (I really should re-learn a way to get pictures in this blog, but oh well. If I hold off on writing until I do that, it never works out.) But I had fun. And it still actually worked, even though I cut my tree wires too short.

And another friend took some notes and let me have them, then I added some more and let her have them. So it's quite possible that I will give myself more chances in the future if I think of just the right stones and wire colors. I'm so glad I decided not to sit out but instead to hog some of the teaching attention for myself.

(Plus I still got to finish the scarf I had brought for my craft project. I didn't finish it in time for local winter, but as I told R, "I'll probably finish this in time for August," the time when you least want a scarf. And indeed I did.)

In conclusion, being the worst at something doesn't necessarily mean you suck, and even if you do, that doesn't necessarily matter. I think a lot of times grown-ups don't want to do things that are new and that they are uncomfortable with and which they are sure will make them look like idiots. But that's sad.

Article of the Day - Huffington Post's 7 Reasons Dressing Your Age Is Overrated with pictures of a parent and grown child swapping clothes (or wearing different sizes of the same clothes so they fit). Of course the young folks all look good in the older folks' clothes, but the opposite is mostly true, too.

The lesson is supposed to be to wear whatever you like or at least that there may be a lot more things that are flattering for you than you realize.

But mostly it's fun to look at the pictures. The people also try to copy the stance of the other person in the "before" picture, which is quite fun.

It wasn't quite as fun to imagine switching clothes with my mom, mostly because I don't know what poses we would strike and then try to copy from each other.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I've heard that you can e-file your taxes for free using some for-profit tax prep software, which didn't make any sense to me. But in fact if you make less than $58,000, you can.

I tried the IRS's tool to find free software. The company Robin has been using is not available to me. It turns out you will have different companies available to you based on your age, location, and income. So I had only two options.

I chose OLT.com because it's available to people of all ages. If I liked it, I could continue using it at different ages.

I like that it lets you type in cents. Plus it autofills some things with common answers. For example, when you're typing in an address, they bring your cursor to the zip code field before the city and state fields so they can fill that in for you. And once you fill out one number from your W-2 form, it will fill out the expected values of the other fields (I still had to change one, but it was nice).

However, it does make you fill in the addresses for all the places that pay you interest, which I had to look up on line because most of them don't provide 99-INT forms (because you don't have to when you pay less than $10 in interest, and their interest rates suck).

When my session had ended because I was taking too long to find those addresses, then that was the end of that.

I switched to the free fillable forms (also accessible via the above link). The forms were not fillable for me. I tried typing--nothing. I tried clicking on a box and typing--nothing. I tried hitting tabs--nothing. I googled for help--one site recommended Tabbing to solve most problems. Another recommended not typing faster than 20 words per minute. Probably I have some anti-ad software that's messing it up for me.

So I decided to just use Robin's software (because once you buy it, several people (five?) can use it). (It's the one that rhymes with Herb O'Flax. That almost rhymes with Herd o' Yaks.) One good thing is that they no longer require addresses for interest-paying entities. Woot!

But they said my refund should be $37.67 less than I thought it should be. That makes me uncomfortable. It's like when your checkbook doesn't balance--you know the bank probably didn't make a mistake, but is your math just wrong or are you forgetting something?

Unfortunately, I couldn't figure out a way to look at the forms. Once you file your taxes they let you print out your forms, but I couldn't see how to look at them before then. All the totals they did let me see matched my totals except for total income, which was $2 higher than my total, probably due to their rounding issues.

Bizarrely, I decided to distrust them rather than me. I started looking up things they could have done wrong. Well, it's not from them forgetting that the taxes on dividends and capital gains are lower than the taxes on other income--that would have been off by a lot more. It also can't be because they didn't let me take my health savings account deduction (they asked me about it at the same time they asked about itemized deductions and if they were calling that a medical expense, it did not exceed 10% of my pay and would not have counted); that would have been off by a little too much.

I tried to reverse-engineer the situation. I'm in the 15% bracket, so $37.67 in taxes implies $565 in income. That is almost equal to the state sales tax estimate of $553.08, so I decided to check if that was actually selected (over my state income taxes of $0). Nope, that wasn't the problem, either.

But then I decided to google this error I kept getting to recheck Schedule D. Is it creepy that I was able to skip over five pieces of advice without trying them to get to the one that actually worked? It turns out I had to delete that whole form and close out of the software, then re-open it and re-enter the data.

But while reading all the bad advice I noticed there was a way to look up the forms and I found the problem: I had listed the qualified dividends as zero instead of the right amount. That's what I get for not giving them my account number and password and letting them download it themselves.

Now it's all fixed, all matching, and e-filed.

Whew.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
One thing about a new job is figuring out the new social codes. Normal people probably do this automatically. Even though I work for the same employer, so I already know about the casual dress code, transit craziness, awesome libraries, etc., a few things that have surprised me about my new group:

* Don't even leave for local team meetings until the start time. But show up a little early for meetings involving outsiders.

* Say hello to office mates the first time you see them each day, but ignore them the rest of the time. Probably I'm supposed to say good-bye when I'm leaving for the day, too.

* When you're leaving the suite and no one else is there, lock the door to the suite. I don't know if this is true even if you're going to be gone only a few minutes, but I suspect so. Corollary: never leave the suite without keys in hand. (No, I did not have to learn this the hard way. Woot!)

* There is no bonding around food. One person actually dislikes when there is food at meetings. Another person said she has never seen the first person eat anything except at their occasional meetings a the coffee shop. No one brings food to share, and there is no table in the break rooms (one per suite), so we never happen to eat lunch together. Not surprisingly, my co-workers are all thin; in all the other offices I've worked at, there has been loads of bonding over food and most of my co-workers were not thin. So pi day this Friday will be like every other day. Oh, right, I don't work on Fridays anyway, so I won't be missing anything.

* There is no bonding around bathrooms, water fountains, or any other gathering place (as far as I can tell). There are two sets of bathrooms, with water fountains nearby, on our floor and I never see anyone at the one I use. We don't even bond going to and from meetings because some of us take the elevator and some take the stairs. Actually, the one person I noticed takes the elevator and I take the stairs.

* Meetings should end ASAP, which is generally good except that I have to be more assertive than I'm used to when bringing up my own issues. I can't wait for a lull because a lull means it's time to end the meeting.
livingdeb: (cartoon)
I recently came across the Slate article, "Two Spaces After a Period: Why You Should Never, Ever Do It". Since I am one of those people who still uses two spaces, I decided to try to be open minded and read it.

(Note: For this blog entry the point is moot: any number of spaces after a period gets truncated into one space unless I use special html coding.)

Basically, three reasons were given:
* because I said so
* because two spaces is an eyesore
* because it is more work to type that extra space

Because I said so

Not just the author, to be fair. "Every modern typographer agrees on the one-space rule."

The author tried to explain that I was taught to add two spaces after a period because I learned my keyboarding skills on a typewriter and old-timey typewriters had monospaced fonts. "Monospaced type gives you text that looks "loose" and uneven; there's a lot of white space between characters and words, so it's more difficult to spot the spaces between sentences immediately. Hence the adoption of the two-space rule." Um, but periods are the skinniest character there is, so there is automatically almost an extra half space after it. Plus, wouldn't it also make it harder to spot spaces between words? I really cannot go for this explanation.

Eyesore

Let me just say that the eyesore defense did not help me keep an open mind since I find it to be the lowest form of defense.

I couldn't even figure out why it was an eyesore at first. For a very long time, a single space after a period looked wrong to me, one might even say ugly. Thankfully, nowadays I don't even notice anymore.

Finally, I figured it out, though (from an article I read later)--bigger spaces means you're more likely to end up in a situation where the spaces themselves make distracting patterns. Like when you're reading a newspaper with really narrow columns that are right- and left-justified. Okay, that makes a tiny amount of sense. (Thank goodness they are not against any spacing at all so we can have even less of an eyesore.)

More work

more work 2 capitlz & spell, 2

Changing traditions

So I checked out wikipedia. It says that spacing was not standardized until the 18th century when typesetters got together. At that time, double or almost double spacing was used in most countries, though "French spacing" or single spacing was used in some areas.

With typewriters, you only had a choice of one or two spaces, and two spaces was closer to the main standard. Actually, they started with three, then moved to two.

Nowadays many people still think you should use two spaces when using monospaced fonts, and one space otherwise.

Also, studies show that no one style is more readable than another.

So, it's like I learned from the book Eats, Shoots and Leaves, sometimes things just change over time. What you knew in the past is no longer true today.

So I can keep using two spaces, knowing that in places where that is discernible, it will mark me as an old-timer.

Cost Reduction

Then I found a rebuttal to the Slate article, "Why two spaces after a period isn't wrong (or, the lies typographers tell about history)".

The author said it's not exactly known what caused the change but there are two theories. One is that reducing the size of the space reduces the amount of paper needed. "Less whitespace means less paper, which means fewer pages, which means reduced costs. Margins became smaller around this time, and standard interword spaces often went from about 1/3 em to 1/4 em."

This is the reason journalists don't use the Oxford comma. (Heh, because there wasn't enough controversy in this post already!)

The other theory is that a uniform space requires less expertise to set. "Operators could punch in the letters very quickly, and worrying about different width spaces required time and training to pay closer attention to syntax. Furthermore, when a line needed to be expanded or compressed, it was easier to simply expand or reduce all spaces in a line, rather than to deal with the aesthetics of how to handle the various width spaces (which had complex rules that can be found in many of the manuals cited above)."

Two spaces were also a problem with automatic line breaks--they could occur between the two spaces, leaving a space at the beginning of the next line.

The author also says, "you’ll hear some advocates for single-spacing talking about how modern fonts can take into account the extra spacing needed to the period in the font itself. But this is also an elaborate lie. Such kerning after periods would require sensitivity to abbreviations versus ends of sentences, something no font can do by itself. (Some publishing software and word processors do try.)"

The author concludes, "I just have to say to typographers: you’ve been had. The publishers wanted to make you cost less and be less relevant, and you fell into that trap. And now you want to go around and kick everyone until they conform to your simplistic, lazy standard? Wow. Just wow."

Conclusion

In conclusion, if I end up in a situation where someone is going apoplectic over my extra space or where a single space is required (such as in Robin's InDesign class, taught by a typesetter), then I will try to make the change (meanwhile doing a lot of search-and-replaces for when I mess up). Or maybe if I'm in danger of getting carpel-tunnel syndrome and want to minimize my typing. Otherwise, I don't mind looking like an old-timer.

Profile

livingdeb: (Default)
livingdeb

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 02:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios